Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;21(8):1077–1085. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00159-14

TABLE 3.

Fallow deer that tested positive by ELISAs A, B, C, and D and by the commercial bovine paratuberculosis ELISA-E according to the presence of focal, multifocal, or diffuse lesions, or according to the presence of latent or patent forms

Histopathology and lesion type No. of deer tested positive/no. total deer by ELISA:
A B C D E
Fallow deer without lesions 0/16 0/16 0/16 0/16 2/16
Fallow deer with histopathological lesions
    Focal 10/16 7/16 9/16 6/16 11/16
    Multifocal 2/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 2/2
    Diffuse intermediate 2/3 3/3 3/3 3/3 3/3
    Diffuse multibacillary 4/4 4/4 4/4 3/4 2/4
    Total 18/25 16/25 18/25 13/25 18/25
    Kappaa 0.6674 0.5812 0.6674 0.4581 0.5633
    P value <0.0001b <0.0001b <0.0001b 0.0003b 0.0003b
Fallow deer with histopathological formsc
    Latent 10/16 7/16 9/16 6/16 11/16
    Patent 8/9 9/9 9/9 7/9 7/9
    Total 18/25 16/25 18/25 13/25 18/25
    Kappad 0.9110 1.000 1.000 0.8175 0.6528
    P value <0.0001b <0.0001b <0.0001b <0.0001b 0.0022b
a

Coefficient of agreement (kappa) between the ELISA results and the presence of focal, multifocal, or diffuse lesions.

b

Statistically significant association between the ELISA results and the presence/absence of lesions or the presence/absence of latent or patent forms (Fisher's test).

c

Histopathological lesions were grouped into two categories, latent (focal lesions) and patent forms (multifocal and diffuse lesions).

d

Coefficient of agreement (kappa) between the ELISA results and the presence of latent or patent forms.