Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;82(8):3457–3470. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01640-14

TABLE 2.

Quantitative analysis of H. pylori pilia

Strain name or description Mean (± SE) no. of pili per bacterial cellb % (± SE) of bacteria with visible pilic
26695 4.1 ± 0.6 81.9 ± 5.9
Δcag PAI Not detected* Not detected*
ΔrdxA 3.1 ± 0.4 82.3 ± 3.2
ΔrpsL 3.8 ± 0.8 72.5 ± 8.6
cag3 marked mutant 0.02 ± 0.02* 0.0 ± 0.0*
cag3 unmarked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cag3 complemented mutant 5.0 ± 1.1 75.0 ± 5.8
cagC marked mutant 3.8 ± 1.2 79.0 ± 6.1
cagC unmarked mutant 2.4 ± 0.7 70.8 ± 7.5
cagM marked mutant 0.1 ± 0.1* 0.0 ± 0.0*
cagM unmarked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cagM complemented mutant 3.7 ± 0.9 85.8 ± 4.6
cagT marked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cagT complemented mutant 5.7 ± 0.8* 74.4 ± 5.4
cagV marked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cagV unmarked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cagV complemented mutant 4.8 ± 1.2 79.2 ± 8.6
cagX marked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cagX unmarked mutant Not detected* Not detected*
cagX complemented mutant 4.4 ± 1.1 77.3 ± 8.4
cagY marked mutant 5.4 ± 1.1 81.7 ± 6.2
a

SE, standard error of the mean. *, P < 0.005 compared to results for the parental strain, based on two-tailed t test analysis.

b

Images of at least 20 adherent bacterial cells, derived from three separate experiments, were analyzed. Among the strains capable of pilus production, nonpiliated bacteria were included in the analysis.

c

Percent piliated bacteria were quantified based on images of at least 10 fields, derived from three separate experiments.