Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug;88(16):8924–8935. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00556-14

TABLE 5.

Statistical significance of differential expression (either up or down) of proviruses between Tat treatment and vehicle treatmenta

Chromosome Locus Name and alternate name(s) P value
Significance rank Q value
Unique Max
7 7q34 K(OLDAC004979), ERVK-15 1.8742E−63 1.8742E−63 1 1.6868E−61
3 3q12.3 K(II), ERVK-5 7.9669E−68 7.9669E−68 2 3.5851E−66
1 1q21.3 1q21.3 2.1190E−56 2.1190E−56 3 6.3569E−55
4 4p16.1b K50c 1.8560E−40 1.8560E−40 4 4.1759E−39
1 1q22 K102, K(C1b), K50a, ERVK-7 6.3468E−34 6.3468E−34 5 1.1424E−32
11 11p15.4 K7 8.2763E−25 8.2763E−25 6 1.2414E−23
11 11q12.3 K(OLDAC004127) 8.1670E−20 8.1670E−20 7 1.0500E−18
3 3p12.3 3p12.3 1.4842E−17 1.4842E−17 8 1.6697E−16
19 19q13.12b K50F 4.7480E−18 4.7480E−18 9 4.7480E−17
8 8q24.3b K29 1.0238E−14 1.0238E−14 10 9.2144E−14
1 1q23.3 K110, K18, K(C1a), ERVK-18 1.3727E−12 1.3727E−12 11 1.1231E−11
14 14q11.2 K(OLDAL136419), K71 6.7613E−11 6.7613E−11 12 5.0710E−10
9 9q34.11 K31 1.6819E−10 1.6819E−10 13 1.1644E−09
7 7q22.2 ERVK-14 2.1008E−10 2.1008E−10 14 1.3505E−09
8 8p23.1d KOLD130352 2.1788E−09 2.1788E−09 15 1.3073E−08
19 19q13.12a 19q13.12a 7.9436E−09 7.9436E−09 16 4.4683E−08
4 4q32.1 4q32.1 1.6633E−07 1.6633E−07 17 8.8058E−07
8 8p23.1c 8p23.1c 2.9556E−07 2.9556E−07 18 1.4778E−06
22 22q11.21 K101, K(C22), ERVK-24 4.7333E−07 4.7333E−07 19 2.2421E−06
8 8q11.1 K70, K43 1.1955E−06 1.1955E−06 20 5.3795E−06
16 16p13.3 K(OLDAC004034) 1.6706E−06 1.6706E−06 21 7.1599E−06
6 6p11.2 K23 2.9726E−06 2.9726E−06 22 1.2161E−05
5 5p12 K8 7.1232E−06 7.1232E−06 23 2.7873E−05
22 22q11.23 K(OLDAP000345), KOLD345 1.0234E−05 1.0234E−05 24 3.8378E−05
10 10p14 K(C11a), K33, ERVK-16 3.9553E−07 3.9553E−07 25 1.4239E−06
8 8p23.1a K115, ERVK-8 1.8342E−05 1.8342E−05 26 6.3492E−05
17 17p13.1 17p13.1 2.0446E−04 2.0446E−04 27 6.8154E−04
21 21q21.1 K60, ERVK-23 6.0462E−04 6.0462E−04 28 1.9434E−03
19 19p12a K52 1.7990E−03 1.7990E−03 29 5.5831E−03
1 1p31.1 K4, K116, ERVK-1 2.2897E−03 2.2897E−03 30 6.8692E−03
X Xq11.1 Xq11.1 2.7634E−03 2.7634E−03 31 8.0228E−03
19 19q11 K(C19), ERVK-19 4.0119E−03 4.0119E−03 32 1.1283E−02
12 12q24.33 K42 6.4178E−03 6.4178E−03 33 1.7503E−02
7 7p22.1b K108R, ERVK-6, HERV-K (HML-2).HOM 7.1651E−03 7.1651E−03 34 1.8966E−02
6 6q25.1 6q25.1 1.0955E−02 1.0955E−02 35 2.8170E−02
19 19q13.41 19q13.41 1.4918E−02 1.4918E−02 36 3.7295E−02
2 2q21.1 2q21.1 5.9765E−03 5.9765E−03 37 1.4537E−02
19 19q13.42 LTR13 1.6717E−02 1.6717E−02 38 3.9593E−02
a

The different names shown represent alternative ways to refer to the same virus based on the literature. Tat or vehicle unique RPKM values are the reads that had a single unique genomic alignment, mapping to a particular provirus, not shared with any other known provirus. P values were calculated after a proportions test (R function), taking total and unique reads for each treatment. The maximum P value between those tests was selected and corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate, generating Q values. Shown are proviruses with significant differential expression among treatments (Q < 0.05), ordered according to significance rank.