. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Prim Prev. 2014 Apr;35(2):75–84. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0337-9

Table 3.

The influence of intervention on alcohol involvement among first-year students: dichotomous outcomes (N = 695)

	B	SE	OR (95 % CI)
Full sample
Risky drinking	.02	.21	1.02 (.68, 1.54)
Any drinking	−.38	.25	.68 (.42, 1.13)
Hazardous drinkers^a
Risky drinking	−.28	.45	.76 (.31, 1.84)
Any drinking	.52	1.01	1.68 (.23, 12.11)
Non-drinkers^b
Risky drinking	.07	.48	1.07 (.41, 2.77)
Any drinking	−.69	.34	.50^* (.26, .98)

Note Baseline alcohol use variable is used as a covariate for the full sample analyses only. Control is the reference group in all analyses. Controls make up 35 % of the sample

Hazardous drinkers at baseline

Non-drinkers at baseline

p <0.05