Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;9(8):1894–1905. doi: 10.1021/cb500371g

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Binding preferences of conformation-selective, ATP-competitive inhibitors. (A) Ligands that stabilize the DFG-out and αC helix-out conformations make a number of different interactions with the ATP-binding sites of kinases. Left: Src bound to 3 with the ATP-binding site in an inactive, αC helix-out conformation (PDB: 4DGG). The αC helix is rotated out of the active site, disrupting the interaction between Lys295 and Glu310. Right: Abl bound to 5 with the active site in an inactive, DFG-out conformation (PDB: 3OXZ). The DFG motif is flipped out of the active site, but Glu310 in the αC helix maintains a salt bridge with the catalytic lysine (the distance between the NH of 5 and the Glu310 side chain is 3.0 Å). The gatekeeper (Thr338), catalytic lysine (Lys295), and catalytic glutamic acid (Glu310) residues are shown in light blue (Src numbering). (B) Analogues of 3 that were tested in activity assays against Srcact, Hckact, SrcSH2eng, and HckSH2eng constructs. Quantitative comparison of the fold differences in Ki values between activated SFKs (SFKact) and their respective autoinhibited constructs (SFKSH2eng) allow systematic analysis of ATP-binding site conformational preference. Raw data for all assays are shown in Supporting Information Table S5.