Table 2. Pooled-ANOVA of NIR Pseudo-Absorbance Data.
| treatment | df | SS | MS | F | p-value | RSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| milk class | 1 | 221 | 221 | 130 | ≪10–3 | 8.7% |
| day | 2 | 21 | 11 | 6.2 | 3 × 10–3 | 0.8% |
| processing type | 2 | 223 | 111 | 65 | ≪10–3 | 8.8% |
| production site | 10 | 980 | 98.0 | 57 | ≪ 10–3 | 38.8% |
| sample | 37 | 665 | 18.0 | 10 | ≪10–3 | 26.3% |
| milk × processing | 2 | 108 | 54.2 | 31 | ≪10–3 | 4.3% |
| processing × day | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.59 | 0.2% |
| milk × day | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.51 | 0.1% |
| site × day | 20 | 53 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.07 | 2.1% |
| residual error | 144 | 247 | 1.7 | 9.8% |