Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e105283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105283

Table 2. Familiarity with and attitudes regarding PrEPa.

Variable N = 86b
Familiarity with PrEP
Not at all familiar 14 (16.5)
Somewhat familiar 32 (37.7)
Very familiar 39 (45.9)
Have been asked about PrEP in the last year 28 (32.6)
Number of occasions 2 (2,10)
Category of patient inquiring about PrEP
MSM 22 (71.0)
Serodiscordant couple 14 (60.9)
Commercial sex worker 1 (8.3)
Intravenous drug user 1 (8.3)
Have ever prescribed PrEP 11 (12.9)
Number of occasions in past year 2 (1,4)
Category of patients to whom PrEP was prescribed
MSM 7 (38.9)
Serodiscordant couple 5 (31.3)
Commercial sex worker 1 (8.3)
Other (“Pregnancy attempt”) 1 (8.3)
Enthusiasm if ever discussed PrEP with a patient
Unenthusiastic 3 (3.5)
Neutral 25 (29.1)
Enthusiastic 8 (9.3)
Not applicable 50 (58.1)
Proportion willing to prescribe PrEPc
Willing 39 (45.5)
Unwilling 4 (4.7)
Unsure 43 (50)
Minimum acceptable level of protection provided by PrEP (%) for it to be recommended to high-risk individuals 66 (40,80)
Belief that Health Canada should approve PrEP for use in Canadad
Yes 41 (49.4)
No 11 (13.3)
Maybe 31 (37.4)
a

Values shown are number (percentage) or median (IQR).

b

Responses may not sum to 86 due to missing values.

c

Proportion of respondents willing to prescribe PrEP based on current knowledge for high-risk patients who have a mechanism to cover medication costs.

d

Response to question “According to one study among men who have sex with men (MSM), oral PrEP provided 44% protection against HIV infection overall and 73% protection in participants who used PrEP consistently (i.e. took the medication on a regular schedule and did not miss doses). Other studies show that PrEP provides a similar level of protection among heterosexual men and women. Considering this level of protection, do you believe Health Canada should approve PrEP for use in Canada?”