Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 12;7:465–470. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S66414

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data on nine patients with exclusive or predominant low back pain treated with paddle spinal cord stimulation

Case no Age, sex Diagnosis Implant level, device VAS preop
VAS postop
% dec of LBP* Follow-up (months)
LBP LE LBP LE
1 47, F DDD (L5/S1)
DJD (L4/5–L5/S1)
T8–9, SJM Tripole 7 3 50 41
2 46, F FBSS (L5/S1) T9–10, SJM Tripole 4 1 75 24
3 40, M DDD (L5/S1)
DJD (L3/4–L5/S1)
T6–7, SJM Tripole 4 1 80 12
4 52, M L2 fracture T8–9, SJM Tripole 8 2 75 24
5 33, F FBSS (L5/S1) T12, SJM Tripole 8 9 0 24
6 69, F FBSS (T9–L5) T6–7, SJM Tripole 8.5 1 80 12
7 58, M DDD (L1–S1) T8–9, SJM Tripole 5 0 75 18
8 68, F FBSS (L4–L5) T8–9, SJM Tripole 10 9 0 0 98 12
9 75, F DDD (L3/5–L5/S1)
DJD (L3/5–L5/S1)
T9–10, SJM Penta 10 6 3.5 0 65 12

Note:

*

Patient estimated decrease of low back pain at follow-up.

Abbreviations: DDD, degenerative disc disease; dec, decrease; DJD, degenerative joint disease; FBSS, failed back surgery syndrome; LBP, low back pain; LE, lower extremity; SJM, St Jude Medical; VAS, visual analogue scale.