Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 18;7(4):632–637. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.04.08

Table 3. Comparison of the diagnostic value between the two ultrasonic methods with the surgical results.

Evaluation content UBM diagnosis Immersion ultrasonography diagnosis χ2; P
Coincidental diagnosis rates 32/56 (57.14%) 56/56 (100%) 30.55; 0.0000
Misdiagnosis/missed diagnosis rates 10/56 (17.86%) 0/56 (0%) 8.89; 0.0029
Suspected diagnosis rates 16/56 (28.57%) 0/56 (0%) 116.41; 0.0001