Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jun 28;48:196–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.006

Table 2.

Weighted analyses of job satisfaction and depression in 1992 on failure to attain aspirations (NLSY)

All Meng Womeng

Job Satisfaction Odds ratio Depression IRR Depression IRR
Aspiration-Attainment matcha
 Exceeded −0.15 (0.11) 0.86 0.17 (0.08) 1.19 −0.02 (0.07) 0.98
 Fell short −0.26* (0.10) 0.77 0.22** (0.07) 1.25 −0.01 (0.07) 0.99
 Did not know aspiration −0.15 (0.14) 0.86 0.20* (0.10) 1.22 −0.00 (0.09) 1.00
Occupational SEI score 0.01*** (0.00) 1.01 −0.00 (0.00) 1.00 0.00 (0.00) 1.00
Logged income 0.01 (0.03) 1.01 −0.03 (0.02) 0.97 −0.01 (0.02) 0.99
Employment statusb
 Unemployed −0.36* (0.15) 0.70 0.18* (0.08) 1.20 0.30*** (0.08) 1.35
 Not in labor force −0.32* (0.14) 0.72 0.41*** (0.11) 1.50 0.10 (0.07) 1.11
Years of schooling 0.01 (0.02) 1.01 −0.00 (0.01) 1.00 −0.03* (0.01) 0.97
Marital statusc
 Never married −0.14* (0.07) 0.87 0.23*** (0.05) 1.26 0.16** (0.05) 1.17
 Separated/divorced/widowed −0.16* (0.08) 0.85 0.33*** (0.06) 1.39 0.28*** (0.05) 1.32
Number of children 0.05 (0.03) 1.05 0.06*** (0.02) 1.06 −0.02 (0.02) 0.98
Female 0.04 (0.06) 1.04 --- ---
Race/ethnicityd
 Black −0.19* (0.08) 0.83 0.05 (0.05) 1.06 −0.02 (0.05) 0.98
 Latin 0.18* (0.08) 1.20 0.04 (0.06) 1.04 −0.01 (0.06) 0.99
 Other 0.01 (0.08) 1.01 −0.05 (0.05) 0.95 −0.01 (0.06) 0.99
Age −0.01 (0.01) 0.99 0.00 (0.01) 1.00 0.02* (0.01) 1.02
Two-parent family 0.02 (0.06) 1.02 −0.02 (0.04) 0.98 −0.08 (0.04) 0.92
Number of siblings −0.01 (0.01) 0.99 −0.01 (0.01) 0.99 0.01 (0.01) 1.01
Parent in professional occupation −0.03 (0.09) 0.97 −0.07 (0.06) 0.93 0.02 (0.07) 1.02
Parent’s educatione
 Less than high school −0.10 (0.07) 0.90 0.03 (0.05) 1.03 −0.01 (0.05) 0.99
 Some college/technical school −0.02 (0.09) 0.98 0.04 (0.06) 1.04 −0.04 (0.06) 0.96
 Four years of college −0.12 (0.09) 0.89 0.11 (0.07) 1.12 0.14* (0.07) 1.15
AFQT score −0.00** (0.00) 1.00 −0.00*** (0.00) 1.00 −0.00*** (0.00) 1.00
1980 Self-esteem 0.04*** (0.01) 1.04 −0.04*** (0.00) 0.96 −0.04*** (0.01) 0.97
1979 Job satisfactionf
 Like fairly well −0.45*** (0.08) 0.64 --- ---
 Dislike somewhat/very much −0.71*** (0.12) 0.49 --- ---
 Not working −0.32*** (0.08) 0.72 --- ---
Constant ---- 3.41*** 3.67***

N 7,769 4,103 3,600

Cragg-Uhler R-squared ---- 0.12 0.09
Log-likelihood −7712.79 ----
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001, Standard errors in parentheses

a

Reference category is “Matched aspiration and attainment”

b

Reference category is “Employed”

c

Reference category is “Married”

d

Reference category is “White”

e

Reference category is “Completed HS”

f

Reference category is “Like very much”

g

Significant differences between men and women in the fully interacted model (p<.05) are bolded for ease of interpretation.