Table 3.
African American | Hispanic | Caucasian | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
Intercept | −2.437***a,b | 0.161 | −1.738*** | 0.086 | −1.304*** | 0.218 |
Individual level | ||||||
Age | 0.476***a | 0.066 | 0.306***c | 0.044 | 0.471*** | 0.068 |
Male | 0.122b | 0.252 | 0.302c | 0.188 | −1.148*** | 0.426 |
Household salary | 0.062 | 0.052 | 0.119** | 0.048 | 0.093 | 0.062 |
Peer substance use | 0.303*** | 0.115 | 0.192 | 0.098 | −0.233 | 0.253 |
Parental problem drug use | 0.544 | 0.289 | −0.198 | 0.328 | 0.518 | 0.399 |
Parental warmth | 0.025 | 0.056 | −0.042 | 0.046 | −0.147** | 0.068 |
Prior cigarette use | 1.455***b | 0.297 | 1.685*** | 0.427 | 3.049*** | 0.701 |
χ2 | 72.461 | 63.707 | 79.701 | |||
Neighborhood level | ||||||
Disadvantage | 0.031 | 0.040 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.132 |
Proportion of variance explained | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Note: EB = empirical Bayes. Results are based on Bernoulli models using EB estimates and fixed effects for all individual-level variables; sample sizes are as follows: 644 African Americans living in 54 NCs, 870 Hispanics from 65 NCs, and 272 Caucasians from 46 NCs.
Difference between African American and Hispanic groups significant at p ≤ .05.
Difference between African American and Caucasian groups significant at p ≤ .05.
Difference between Hispanic and Caucasian groups significant at p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .01.