Table 4.
African American | Hispanic | Caucasian | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
Intercept | −2.092***a,b | 0.172 | −1.592***c | 0.109 | −1.199*** | 0.159 |
Individual level | ||||||
Age | 0.575*** | 0.069 | 0.463*** | 0.046 | 0.484*** | 0.092 |
Male | −0.004 | 0.219 | 0.376 | 0.235 | −0.159 | 0.405 |
Household salary | 0.026 | 0.044 | 0.106** | 0.052 | 0.023 | 0.047 |
Peer substance use | 0.128 | 0.135 | 0.291*** | 0.104 | 0.561 | 0.346 |
Parental problem drug use | 0.008 | 0.279 | 0.390 | 0.311 | −0.443 | 0.467 |
Parental warmth | −0.010 | 0.064 | −0.048 | 0.042 | −0.111 | 0.077 |
Prior alcohol use | 1.352*** | 0.326 | 1.002*** | 0.242 | 0.642 | 0.422 |
χ2 | 51.305 | 68.427 | 47.687 | |||
Neighborhood level | ||||||
Disadvantage | 0.012*a | 0.007 | −0.005 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Proportion of variance explained | 0.054 | 0.025 | 0.000 |
Note: EB = empirical Bayes. Results are based on Bernoulli models using EB estimates and fixed effects for all individual-level variables; sample sizes are as follows: 644 African Americans living in 54 NCs, 870 Hispanics from 65 NCs, and 272 Caucasians from 46 NCs.
Difference between African American and Hispanic groups significant at p ≤ .05.
Difference between African American and Caucasian groups significant at p ≤ .05.
Difference between Hispanic and Caucasian groups significant at p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .10.
p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .01.