Table 5.
African American | Hispanic | Caucasian | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
Intercept | −5.820***a,b | 0.339 | −3.457***c | 0.197 | −2.757*** | 0.258 |
Individual level | ||||||
Age | 1.368***a,b | 0.136 | 0.443*** | 0.062 | 0.315*** | 0.071 |
Male | −0.104a | 0.332 | 0.843*** | 0.263 | 0.573 | 0.451 |
Household salary | 0.148*** | 0.052 | 0.024 | 0.070 | 0.045 | 0.088 |
Peer substance use | −0.156 | 0.196 | 0.247 | 0.153 | 0.536 | 0.337 |
Parental problem drug use | −0.428 | 0.532 | −0.212 | 0.365 | 0.042 | 0.631 |
Parental warmth | 0.019 | 0.070 | −0.029 | 0.070 | −0.063 | 0.088 |
Prior binge drinking | 3.292*** | 1.018 | 1.798*** | 0.640 | 1.373 | 0.847 |
χ2 | 289.271 | 100.591 | 59.971 | |||
Neighborhood level | ||||||
Disadvantage | 0.065 | 0.259 | −0.035 | 0.069 | −0.138 | 0.128 |
Proportion of variance explained | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.027 |
Note: EB = empirical Bayes. Results are based on Bernoulli models using EB estimates and fixed effects for all individual-level variables; sample sizes are as follows: 644 African Americans living in 54 NCs, 870 Hispanics from 65 NCs, and 272 Caucasians from 46 NCs.
Difference between African American and Hispanic groups significant at p ≤ .05.
Difference between African American and Caucasian groups significant at p ≤ .05.
Difference between Hispanic and Caucasian groups significant at p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .10.
p ≤ .05.
p ≤ .01.