Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar 25;49(12):2285–2300. doi: 10.1037/a0032312

Table 2.

Measurement Models for the SEM analyses in Figures 2 and 3: Standardized Loadings of the Manifest Indicators for Each Latent Construct

Latent Construct Manifest Indicators Model 1 Loadings Model 2 Loadings
T1 Behavior Inhibition Inhibition .96 .95
Fearful Distress .82 .82
Latency to Approach .83 .83
T1 Behavioral Flexibility Coping .69 .69
Enthusiasm .90 .90
Persistence .86 .86
Problem-Solving .63 .63
T2 Behavioral Flexibility Coping .85 .85
Enthusiasm .94 .94
Persistence .92 .92
Problem-Solving .70 .70
T1 Externalizing Problems Experimenter 1 Q-Sort .87 --
Experimenter 2 Q-Sort .66 --
Experimenter 1 C-TRF .84 --
T3 Externalizing Problems Experimenter 1 Q-Sort .95 --
Experimenter 2 Q-Sort .75 --
Experimenter 1 C-TRF .84 --
T1 Internalizing Problems Experimenter 1 Q-Sort -- .77
Experimenter 2 Q-Sort -- .71
Experimenter 1 C-TRF -- .67
T3 Internalizing Problems Experimenter 1 Q-Sort -- .76
Experimenter 2 Q-Sort -- .70
Experimenter 1 C-TRF -- .55
T1 Interparental Aggression CTS Physical Assault .79 .79
CTS Psychological Aggression .86 .85
IDI Aggression .51 .51
T2 Parenting Difficulties Insensitivity .89 .88
Warmth −.80 −.80
Quality Assistance −.84 −.85