Table 3.
Tests of Equilibrium Neutral Model Which Could Detect Recent Selective Sweeps.
| CLSW |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | FW’s H (FDR P value) | LR Value (FDR P value) | α | X | GOF-Sel (FDR P value) |
| bam | −0.925 (0.337) | 1.365 (0.518) | — | — | — |
| bgcn | −19.174 (0.016)* | 8.375 (0.087) | — | — | — |
| BKK | −12.321 (0.056) | 5.079 (0.337) | — | — | — |
| BOG | −12.267 (0.040) | 3.440 (0.518) | — | — | — |
| nos | 0.281 (0.542) | 2.203 (0.649) | — | — | — |
| ote | −3.739 (0.335) | 3.547 (0.446) | — | — | — |
| pum | 0.927 (0.518) | 5.995 (0.049)** | 95.62 | 2,399 | 61.708 (0.526) |
| stwl | −7.495 (0.047) | 13.431 (0.010)** | 143.71 | 2,178 | −81.122 (0.518) |
| BKK | −7.868 (0.049) | 8.729 (0.047)** | 42.22 | 2,408 | 64.791 (1.000) |
| BOG | −7.286 (0.051) | 7.158 (0.034)** | 59.43 | 2,092 | 139.856 (0.335) |
| Yb | 0.356 (0.567) | 2.466 (0.832) | — | — | — |
Note.—FW’s H, H statistics from Fay and Wu (2000); LR, natural log-likelihood ratio of selection versus neutrality as calculated by the method of Kim and Stephan (2002); α, the strength of selection measured by 2Nes; X, ML position of the beneficial mutation where the position is based on the Drosophila ananassae CDS; GOF-Sel, goodness of fit of the data to a selection model as calculated by the method of Jensen et al. (2005). FDR, false discovery rate. P values are FDR-corrected values for multiple hypothesis comparisons and are listed in parenthesis.
*Significant two-tailed FDR-corrected P value < 0.025; **significant one-tailed FDR-corrected P value < 0.05.