Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2014 Jul 21;193(5):2317–2329. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303223

Table 3.

GMCSF-MOG prevented EAE in the midst of a CFA-induced pro-inflammatory environment

Treatment Incidence of EAE Mean cumulative score Median cumulative score Mean maximal score Median maximal score % maximal weight loss
(a) MOG/CFA + GMCSF-PLP 6 of 6 40.8 ± 15.1 43.3 3.1 ± 0.7 3.0 17.2%
(b) MOG/CFA + GMCSF-MOG 2 of 6 4.0 ± 8.4 0.0 0.8 ± 1.3 0.0 3.4%
(c) MOG/CFA alone + saline 8 of 8 56.6 ± 18.3 54.5 3.7 ± 0.5 4.0 19.0%
(d) PBS/CFA + GMCSF-MOG 0 of 6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 1.7%

(a–d) C57BL/6 mice were injected with 77.5 nmole (200 μg) MOG35-55 in CFA with an adjacent injection of saline (c) or 2 nmole of either GMCSF-PLP (a) or GMCSF-MOG (b) in saline. A separate group of mice were injected with a saline/CFA emulsion and an adjacent injection of 2 nmole GMCSF-MOG (d). All four groups also received Pertussis toxin (200 ng i.p.) on days 0 and 2. Data analysis was based on daily assessments from day 0 to day 35. These data were previously shown as a density dot plot (Figure 6B of (14)).(b) and (d) versus (a) or (c); cumulative score, p < 0.001, maximal score, p≤0.002, maximal weight loss, p≤0.004.