Table 3.
GMCSF-MOG prevented EAE in the midst of a CFA-induced pro-inflammatory environment
Treatment | Incidence of EAE | Mean cumulative score | Median cumulative score | Mean maximal score | Median maximal score | % maximal weight loss |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) MOG/CFA + GMCSF-PLP | 6 of 6 | 40.8 ± 15.1 | 43.3 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 3.0 | 17.2% |
(b) MOG/CFA + GMCSF-MOG | 2 of 6 | 4.0 ± 8.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 ± 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.4% |
(c) MOG/CFA alone + saline | 8 of 8 | 56.6 ± 18.3 | 54.5 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 4.0 | 19.0% |
(d) PBS/CFA + GMCSF-MOG | 0 of 6 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7% |
(a–d) C57BL/6 mice were injected with 77.5 nmole (200 μg) MOG35-55 in CFA with an adjacent injection of saline (c) or 2 nmole of either GMCSF-PLP (a) or GMCSF-MOG (b) in saline. A separate group of mice were injected with a saline/CFA emulsion and an adjacent injection of 2 nmole GMCSF-MOG (d). All four groups also received Pertussis toxin (200 ng i.p.) on days 0 and 2. Data analysis was based on daily assessments from day 0 to day 35. These data were previously shown as a density dot plot (Figure 6B of (14)).(b) and (d) versus (a) or (c); cumulative score, p < 0.001, maximal score, p≤0.002, maximal weight loss, p≤0.004.