Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 14;41(9):091905. doi: 10.1118/1.4892602

TABLE II.

Lesion volume assessment using threshold segmentation method in PET images. The lesion volume, mean SUV for lesion and background are listed between RS and FB. Significant differences in segmented lesion volume (p = 0.01) and the mean SUV (p = 0.01) are between RS and FB PET images, while the averaged background is similar (p = 0.15).

          Distant mean
    Lesion volume Mean SUV TLG liver bkgd
    (cm3) (g/ml) (g/ml cm3) (g/ml)
Patient Threshold(%) RS FB %Diff RS FB %Diff RS FB %Diff RS FB %Diff
1 50 1.3 2.0 54.3 7.5 6.1 −18.9 9.5 11.9 24.5 2.4 2.4 −2.1
2 50 3.4 6.2 80.1 6.9 5.2 −23.0 23.3 32.2 38.5 2.0 2.2 7.4
3 50 12.0 14.2 17.9 13.9 10.4 −24.6 166.6 148.0 −11.2 2.6 3.3 25.0
4 70 2.2 6.5 200.0 5.7 4.4 −22.8 12.2 28.2 131.5 2.7 2.7 0.0
5 50 2.7 3.6 32.1 5.0 4.4 −12.1 13.5 15.7 16.2 3.1 2.8 −7.8
6 50 25.7 51.7 101.1 10.4 6.6 −36.7 267.0 339.9 27.3 3.0 2.9 −1.3
7 50 3.2 5.8 78.6 4.8 3.7 −21.9 15.5 21.6 39.6 2.4 2.4 0.0
8 50 5.6 5.0 −10.4 11.4 9.7 −14.9 63.5 48.4 −23.8 2.8 2.8 1.4
9 50 1.5 2.5 72.8 6.5 4.3 −34.7 9.6 10.8 13.2 2.8 2.8 1.4
10 50 6.9 7.7 12.8 6.5 6.0 −8.3 44.5 46.0 3.4 2.5 2.5 −0.4
11 50 11.1 11.7 6.2 7.6 6.3 −17.9 84.1 73.4 −12.7 2.2 2.4 5.8
12 20 27.6 35.8 29.8 10.7 9.2 −14.2 295.5 329.4 11.5 3.1 3.2 2.3
13 60 6.0 7.1 19.6 4.0 4.0 0.3 23.8 28.6 19.9 2.7 2.8 2.9
14 50 21.3 30.8 44.5 8.9 7.3 −18.3 190.3 224.8 18.1 3.3 3.1 −6.3
15 50 2.8 3.5 23.9 10.4 9.4 −9.3 29.4 33.1 12.7 3.1 3.0 −1.6
16 50 6.2 5.8 −6.3 6.4 5.3 −17.1 39.3 30.5 −22.4 3.5 2.9 −17.1
17 50 2.4 3.8 56.1 4.6 4.0 −13.1 11.3 15.4 35.7 2.0 2.1 3.9
18 50 2.2 8.3 286.5 3.1 2.9 −8.0 6.7 23.9 254.6 1.4 2.0 40.8
19 50 10.7 13.2 23.8 14.1 18. 28.2 150.4 238.7 58.8 2.2 4.3 94.5
20 50 13.4 14.7 9.5 7.3 8.5 16.3 98.1 124.8 27.2 2.6 3.6 41.4
Mean 50.0     47.3     −18.4     17.9     0.6
St.dev 9.7     52.1     9.3     36.0     8.7
p-value     0.01     0.01     0.04   0.15 (>0.05)
z-score     3.8     2.8     2.2   1.4 (<2.0)