Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct 11;35(2):309–317. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22835

Table 3.

Instrumental variation in a phantom

Scan 5.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5%
1 - - - - - -
2 −0.96% 0.02% 3.19% 5.53% −1.88% −1.98%
3 2.91% −0.63% −0.97% −1.10% 1.78% 1.13%
4 −1.67% 0.72% −4.67% 0.57% −0.45% −1.78%
5 1.66% −2.60% 4.36% −2.54% −2.08% 1.71%
6 −3.73% 0.92% −2.67% 0.23% −0.30% 0.47%
7 2.12% −2.60% −1.61% 1.53% −1.13% −7.95%
8 1.34% 6.17% 5.49% 4.32% 3.86% 11.12%
9 −1.23% −2.15% −1.37% −5.13% −0.76% −1.11%
10 0.87% 0.45% 2.98% −1.29% 0.23% −2.42%
11 −1.09% −1.55% −1.95% 4.65% 2.36% 1.12%
12 0.06% −2.18% −4.41% −5.24% −3.79% −3.43%
13 0.30% 4.92% 7.41% −0.04% 3.26% 4.55%
14 0.05% −2.03% −2.30% 5.41% −0.58% −2.67%
15 −1.31% −2.44% −2.57% −4.45% −1.68% −6.86%
16 0.48% −0.03% 0.23% 2.17% −1.75% 9.51%

SD 1.70% 2.66% 3.71% 3.67% 2.14% 5.23%