TABLE 3.

New bone area percentage (not including residual biomaterial, group means±SD; n=6)

	12 days	24 days
Silk scaffold	7.23 ± 0.68	39.57 ± 1.58
Silk scaffold + EMD	8.28 ± 1.06%	41.25 ±2.14c
Silk scaffold + EMD + iPS cells	15.43 ± 2.43a,b	58.53 ± 2.67a,b

^aStatistically significant difference comparedtosilk scaffold and silk scaffold + EMD + iPS cells group (P< 0.01).

^bStatistically significant difference compared to silk scaffold + EMD and silk scaffold + EMD + iPS cells group (P < 0.01).

^cStatistically significant difference compared to silk scaffold and silk scaffold+EMD control group (P< 0.05).