Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec 25;18(2):359–373. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002

Table 2.

Overall challenge results. The last three columns contain the scores including standard deviations. These scores are an average of all individual metric scores over all cases, as explained in section 3.2. For the live challenge scores with an asterisk, teams had either missing or incomplete segmentations for some cases. Incomplete or failed cases were assigned a score of 0. The scores of these groups over all completed cases is shown in brackets. The UBUdG team did not participate in the live challenge and as such received a zero score.

Rank Team Name Type Online Live Average
1 Imorphics Automatic 84.36 ± 7.11 87.07 ± 3.36 85.72 ± 5.90
2 ScrAutoProstate Automatic 83.49 ± 5.92 85.08 ± 3.54 84.29 ± 5.10
3 CBA Interactive 80.66 ± 6.46 81.21 ± 9.60 80.94 ± 7.86
4 Robarts Semi-automatic 77.32 ± 4.04 80.08 ± 7.18 78.70 ± 5.51
5 Utwente Semi-automatic 75.23 ± 10.53 80.26 ± 7.30 77.75 ± 9.37
6 Grislies Automatic 77.56 ± 12.60 74.35 ± 11.28 75.96 ± 12.08
7 ICProstateSeg Automatic 76.06 ± 9.40 75.74 ± 8.81* (84.16 ± 4.43) 75.90 ± 9.17
8 DIAG Automatic 73.30 ± 13.69 77.01 ± 12.09 75.16 ± 13.07
9 SBIA Automatic 78.34 ± 8.22 61.38 ± 28.22* (76.72 ± 7.44) 69.86 ± 18.95
10 Rutgers Automatic 65.97 ± 13.13 71.77 ± 11.02 68.87 ± 12.32
11 UBUdG Semi-automatic 70.44 ± 9.12 00.00 ± 0.0* 35.22 ± 9.12

- SecondObserver - 85.00 ± 4.50 85.00 ± 4.91 85.00 ± 4.67