Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 9;142:307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.038

Table 2.

Predictors of Waterpipe Smoking initiation, by gender, among school based cohort of school children aged 13 at baseline, Irbid, Jordan, 2008–2011: longitudinal analysis (N=1,243)

Theoretical
Domain
Potential Predictor Variablesa Boys (n=561) Girls (n=682)

OR (95%CI) AOR* (95%CI) OR (95%CI) AOR* (95%CI)
Predisposing Smoke cigarettes 7.17 (5.03, 10.20) 7.41 (4.05, 12.92) 9.93 (6.55, 15.05) 8.48 (4.34, 16.56)
Density Indexb (continuous)** 0.89 (0.74, 1.07) 1.07 (0.80, 1.43) 0.91 (0.74, 1.11) 1.02 (0.72, 1.45)
Mother’s education (> High School) 1.09 (0.76, 1.56) 1.95 (0.93, 4.07) 0.69 (0.46, 1.04) 0.56 (0.24, 1.28)
Father’s education (> High School) 0.85 (0.59, 1.22) 0.53 (0.25, 1.12) 0.61 (0.41, 0.91) 1.28 (0.58, 2.81)
Daily allowance (≥0 .50 JOD)c 1.67 (1.21, 2.30) 1.45 (0.76, 2.78) 1.06 (0.76, 1.47) 0.56 (0.24, 1.28)
Age in years (continuous) 1.19 (1.03, 1.37) 0.80 (0.60, 1.06) 1.06 (0.92, 1.24) 0.84 (0.60, 1.16)
Participation in sports 3.43 (1.94, 6.07) 4.28 (1.60, 11.43) 1.29 (0.82, 2.02) 0.68 (0.31, 1.49)
Information Propaganda encouraging smoking 1.28 (0.92, 1.78) 1.11 (0.62, 2.00) 1.20 (0.87, 1.66) 1.50 (0.84, 2.69)
Propaganda warning about smoking 0.89 (0.62, 1.28) 0.88 (0.46, 1.67) 0.72 (0.48, 1.06) 2.15 (0.96, 4.82)
Warning labels on WP tobacco packages 1.82 (1.31, 2.52) 1.46 (0.81, 2.62) 1.80 (1.30, 2.50) 1.22 (0.68, 2.22)
Warning of WP dangers from family 0.89 (0.62, 1.28) 1.87 (0.92, 3.81) 0.66 (0.47, 0.93) 0.82 (0.44, 1.50)
Awareness Believe WP is bad for health 0.38 (0.24, 0.59) 0.39 (0.17,0.88) 0.34 (0.20, 0.59) 0.36 (0.13, 0.98)
Motivation Parent(s) smoke WP 2.10 (1.44, 3.06) 1.06 (0.56, 2.03) 3.53 (2.53, 4.94) 1.79 (0.97, 3.33)
Sibling(s) smoke WP 2.42 (1.55, 3.78) 2.30 (1.14, 4.64) 3.14 (2.14, 4.62) 1.37 (0.71, 2.63)
Friends smoke WP 3.37 (2.35, 4.84) 0.68 (0.36, 1.29) 5.82 (4.09, 8.29) 2.96 (1.59, 5.54)
Seen TV actors smoke in past 30 days 1.01 (0.64, 1.58) 0.47 (0.23, 0.99) 0.86 (0.50, 1.51) 0.47 (0.18, 1.23)
Teachers smoke around students 1.01 (0.64, 1.58) 2.07 (1.12, 3.84) 1.53 (1.02, 2.29) 1.44 (0.73, 2.85)
Accept WP from friendsd 22.05 (14.78, 32.90) 26.67 (13.80, 51.53) 20.52 (13.80, 30.52) 11.49 (6.42, 20.55)
Believe have more friends if smoke WP 1.10 (0.75, 1.60) 0.89 (0.46, 1.75) 0.84 (0.53, 1.33) 0.46 (0.19, 1.11)
Believe more attractive if smoke WP 1.35 (0.93, 1.97) 1.24 (0.61, 2.54) 1.79 (1.22, 2.62) 1.31 (0.61, 2.81)
WP weight belief = lose weight 0.93 (0.67, 1.30) 1.05 (0.59, 1.85) 0.80 (0.58, 1.10) 0.88 (0.49, 1.58)
Easy to quit after smoking WP year or twod 2.00 (1.44, 2.78) 1.35 (0.86, 2.14) 1.31 (0.92, 1.85) 0.76 (0.45, 1.27)
Intention Intend to start smoking WP next yeard 17.52 (11.87, 25.84) 8.83 (5.08, 15.35) 11.05 (7.40, 16.51) 4.43 (2.39, 8.21)

OR = Odds Ratio; AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval

*

AOR for each variable is adjusted for all other variables in the model. Statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (P-value < 0.05) are in bold.

**

For continuous variables, the OR approximates the risk change for every one-unit increase in the DI or one year increase in age.

a

No is the referent category

b

Density Index was calculated by dividing the number of people living in each participant’s home by the number of rooms (minus kitchen and bathroom) in the home.

c

In Jordanian Dinars (JOD) (1JOD=1.41USD)

d

Due to suppression effect, AOR for quit belief was not adjusted for intention or self-efficacy. Likewise, intention was not adjusted for quit belief or self-efficacy; nor was self-efficacy was adjusted for quit belief or intention. See text for detailed explanation.