. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Immunol Methods. 2014 Mar 28;0:31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.03.017

Table 4.

Comparison of Accuracy and Precision with In-House EQAPOL assay and In-house EOL readers for EP5.

Accuracy to the Consensus	Reader-Assay	Site 001	Site 003	Site 005	Site 007	Site 009	Site 010	Site 012	Site 013	Site 014	Site 015	Site 103
	IH-IH	54	54	54	54	45	45	54	0	18	54	54
	EOL-IH	54	54	54	36	54	54	54	0	9	36	36
	IH-EQA	54	18	54	18	54	54	54	0	54	54	54
	EOL-EQA	45	18	54	54	54	54	54	0	54	54	54
Precision	IH-IH	18	15	18	15	18	18	18	3	6	12	15
	EOL-IH	18	15	18	15	18	18	18	18	9	15	15
	IH-EQA	15	18	12	18	18	15	15	0	15	15	15
	EOL-EQA	15	18	18	18	18	18	18	18*	15	15	15

The table report the scores for the accuracy and precision based on the combination of reading site (Reader) and assay procedure (Assay). The site specific reader and assay procedure are reported as IH; the standardized EQAPOL assay is reported as EQA; the centralized reader operated by the EQAPOL Oversight Laboratory (EOL) is reported as EOL. The numbers represent the points awarded to the site under each combination.