Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2014 Feb 27;54(8):2034–2044. doi: 10.1111/trf.12585

Table 2.

Base Case Results: Costs and Alloimmunization Events Associated with Alternative Antigen-Matching Strategies

Patients Alloimmunized (%)a Cost Per Patient ($)
Alloimmunization Events Per Patient
Cost Per Alloimmunization Event Averted ($, vs History-Based Matching)d
Average Cost Comparison vs History-Based Matchingb Comparison vs Prospective Matchingc Average No. Events Comparison vs History-Based Matchingb Comparison vs Prospective Matchingc
10 Years
Strategy 1: History-Based Antigen-Matching 30 162,623 -- −84,578 0.46 -- 0.21 --
Strategy 2: Prospective Antigen-Matching 20 247,201 84,578 -- 0.25 −0.21 -- 412,132
Strategy 3: Perfectly Informed Antigen-Matching 20 164,866 2,244 −82,334 0.25 −0.21 0.00 10,934
Strategy 4: Imperfectly Informed Antigen-Matching
  Test Sensitivity = 75%, Specificity = 75%, Cost = $1000 22 185,389 22,767 −61,812 0.31 −0.15 0.06 147,915
  Test Sensitivity = 75%, Specificity = 100%, Cost = $1000 22 164,556 1,933 −82,645 0.31 −0.15 0.06 12,558
  Test Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 75%, Cost = $1000 20 185,700 23,077 −61,501 0.25 −0.21 0.00 112,452
20 Years
Strategy 1: History-Based Antigen-Matching 30 287,313 −145,752 0.60 0.19
Strategy 2: Prospective Antigen-Matching 26 433,064 145,752 -- 0.41 −0.19 -- 759,799
Strategy 3: Perfectly Informed Antigen-Matching 26 288,721 1,409 −144,343 0.41 −0.19 0.00 7,344
Strategy 4: Imperfectly Informed Antigen-Matching
  Test Sensitivity = 75%, Specificity = 75%, Cost = $1000 27 324,955 37,642 −108,109 0.46 −0.14 0.05 261,638
  Test Sensitivity = 75%, Specificity = 100%, Cost = $1000 27 288,619 1,307 −144,445 0.46 −0.14 0.05 9,082
  Test Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 75%, Cost = $1000 26 325,057 37,745 −108,007 0.41 −0.19 0.00 196,761
a

Portion of patients alloimmunized reflects the portion of patients in the cohort modeled who are expected to experience an alloimmunization event during the analysis period (10 or 20 years).

b

Comparison versus Strategy 1 (History-Based Antigen-Matching). Positive values indicate an increase in costs or alloimmunization events and negative values indicate a decrease in outcomes.

c

Comparison versus Strategy 2 (Prospective Antigen-Matching). Positive values indicate an increase in costs or alloimmunization events and negative values indicate a decrease in outcomes.

d

Cost per Alloimmunization Event Averted calculated using the incremental cost and incremental change in alloimmunization events, as compared to History-Based Antigen Matching