Table 2.
Example covariate models for analyses of group membership and outcomes consistent with the absence or presence of shalom
| Covariate | Example indicators of the absence of shalom | Example indicators of the presence of shalom | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequent physical fights | Feel lonely | Do favors for people | Help people | |||||
| ORa | (95 % CI) | ORa | (95 % CI) | ORa | (95 % CI) | ORa | (95 % CI) | |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Girls | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Boys | 3.16* | (2.93–3.40) | 0.74* | (0.70–0.80) | 0.67* | (0.64–0.71) | 0.60* | (0.56–0.63) |
| Grade (per year—range 6–10) | 0.90* | (0.87–0.93) | 0.99 | (0.96–1.02) | 0.99 | (0.96–1.01) | 1.01 | (0.98–1.04) |
| Urban–rural geographic status | ||||||||
| Large urban | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Other urban | 0.88 | (0.74–1.06) | 1.06 | (0.92–1.23) | 1.02 | (0.88–1.19) | 0.89 | (0.77–1.02) |
| Rural | 1.20* | (1.00–1.45) | 0.93 | (0.80–1.08) | 1.03 | (0.88–1.20) | 0.94 | (0.81–1.09) |
| Dissemination area (remote) | 1.36* | (1.13–1.62) | 1.13 | (0.97–1.31) | 0.90 | (0.78–1.05) | 0.87 | (0.20–3.71) |
| Family structure | ||||||||
| Intact | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Not intact | 1.27* | (1.18–1.37) | 1.28* | (1.19–1.37) | 0.79* | (0.75–0.84) | 0.89* | (0.83–0.94) |
| Material wealth (per unit of increased deprivation—range 1–5) | 1.11* | (1.07–1.15) | 1.31* | (1.27–1.36) | 0.87* | (0.84–0.89) | 0.90* | (0.87–0.93) |
| Family meals together per week (per day—range 0–7) | 0.93* | (0.92–0.95) | 0.92* | (0.90–0.93) | 1.07* | (1.06–1.09) | 1.07* | (1.06–1.08) |
2009–2010 Canadian Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Study
* OR estimates are significantly different (p < 0.05) from no association (OR of 1.0)
aEstimated using multi-level procedures; students nested within schools, and SAS PROC GLIMMIX Procedure