Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 21;20(31):10703–10714. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10703

Table 1.

Evidence-based medicine levels of evidence[43]

Level Therapy/prevention, etiology/harm Prognosis
1a SR (with homogeneity1) of RCTs SR (with homogeneity1) of inception cohort studies; CDR2 validated in different populations
1b Individual RCT (with narrow Confidence Interval2) Individual inception cohort study with > 80% follow-up; CDR2 validated in a single population
1c All or none3 All or none case-series
2a SR (with homogeneity1) of cohort studies SR (with homogeneity1) of either retrospective cohort studies or untreated control groups in RCTs
2b Individual cohort study (including low quality RCT; e.g., < 80% follow-up) Retrospective cohort study or follow-up of untreated control patients in an RCT; Derivation of CDR2 or validated on split-sample4 only
2c "Outcomes" Research; Ecological studies "Outcomes" research
3a SR (with homogeneity1) of case-control studies
3b Individual case-control study
1

A systematic review (SR) that is free of worrisome variations (heterogeneity) in the directions and degrees of results between individual studies. Studies displaying worrisome heterogeneity should be tagged with a “-” at the end of their designated level;

2

Clinical decision rule (CDR) (These are algorithms or scoring systems that lead to a prognostic estimation or a diagnostic category);

3

Met when all patients died before the Rx became available, but some now survive on it; or when some patients died before the Rx became available, but now none die on it;

4

Split-sample validation is achieved by collecting all the information in a single tranche, and subsequently artificially dividing this into “derivation” and “validation” samples. RCTs: Randomized control trials.