Skip to main content
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2014 Aug 20;5:308. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00308

Vascular development and hemodynamic force in the mouse yolk sac

Monica D Garcia 1, Irina V Larina 1,*
PMCID: PMC4138559  PMID: 25191274

Abstract

Vascular remodeling of the mouse embryonic yolk sac is a highly dynamic process dependent on multiple genetic signaling pathways as well as biomechanical factors regulating proliferation, differentiation, migration, cell-cell, and cell-matrix interactions. During this early developmental window, the initial primitive vascular network of the yolk sac undergoes a dynamic remodeling process concurrent with the onset of blood flow, in which endothelial cells establish a branched, hierarchical structure of large vessels and smaller capillary beds. In this review, we will describe the molecular and biomechanical regulators which guide vascular remodeling in the mouse embryonic yolk sac, as well as live imaging methods for characterizing endothelial cell and hemodynamic function in cultured embryos.

Keywords: Yolk Sac, live imaging, vascular remodeling, mouse development, Hemodynamics

Introduction

The first functional organ system to form in mammalian embryos is the cardiovascular system. The early establishment of the cardiovascular network during development is a complex, morphogenetic process, which requires the regulation of multiple cell types and the activation of several signal transduction pathways. If this network is not established properly, it affects organ development and embryo viability (Coultas et al., 2005; Udan et al., 2013a). Furthermore, maintenance and stabilization of this complex cardiovascular network must occur throughout adulthood, as impairments in vessel integrity and hemodynamic function can result in poor health or early death (Carmeliet, 2003).

Elucidating the physical and molecular cues required to trigger the morphogenetic events that occur during vascular development has been a significant challenge to developmental biologists, cancer biologists, physiologists, and scientists of many other disciplines for centuries, and has been speculated upon since the time of Aristotle (Risau, 1997). Of particular importance is understanding how the physical cues imparted by hemodynamic force affect the regulatory events and signaling pathways controlling embryonic vessel development. Defining these mechanisms is critical for determining how a normal vascular network develops and how aberrant vascular development can contribute to disease. Importantly, understanding the mechanisms by which a healthy vasculature is established will aid in the development of clinical and therapeutic interventions for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Vasculogenesis in the mouse embryo

The mouse is a leading model system for studying the physical and molecular regulation of vascular development. The availability of genetic manipulation in mice has provided a wealth of information about the molecular pathways involved in the establishment, remodeling and maintenance of the cardiovascular network. In the mouse embryo, the initial establishment of blood vessels occurs in the absence of hemodynamic force. Cells that give rise to the first primitive vessels located in the yolk sac begin to form during gastrulation, which occurs on mouse embryonic day 6.5 (E6.5). During this time, the epiblast, which is a single epithelial cell layer, undergoes an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to form the primitive streak, which gives rise to the germ layers of the embryo proper—the mesoderm, definitive endoderm, and embryonic ectoderm (Nowotschin and Hadjantonakis, 2010; Solnica-Krezel and Sepich, 2012). Vasculogenesis, the de novo formation of a network of blood vessels, is the first phase of vessel development, where blood and endothelial cell precursors (angioblasts) migrate from the mesoderm, aggregate and form the blood islands located in the proximal extraembryonic yolk sac by E7.5 (Figure 1A) (Risau and Flamme, 1995; Shalaby et al., 1997). After the blood islands have formed, angioblasts located at the outer edges divide and differentiate into endothelial cells and migrate distally into the yolk sac, forming a simple capillary network that encompasses the yolk sac. This network of interconnected rudimentary small vessels, homogeneous in shape and size, is the primitive capillary plexus (Figure 1B) (Drake and Fleming, 2000; Coultas et al., 2005; Udan et al., 2013a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Vascular development of the mouse embryonic yolk sac. (A) VEGFR2/Flk1 expression labeling nascent vessels in the blood islands at E7.5; (B) ε-globin-GFP labeled erythroblasts filling the primitive capillary plexus at E8.5, and (C) after vascular remodeling at E9.5.

The initial establishment of the capillary plexus during vasculogenesis is largely dependent on activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway. Several genetic studies in mice identified vascular endothelial receptor 2 (VEGFR2/Flk1) as a regulator of de novo vasculogenesis, critical for the development of both blood cells and the primitive capillary plexus during embryogenesis (Klagsbrun and Soker, 1993; Dvorak et al., 1995; Poole et al., 2001; Coultas et al., 2005). During the de novo establishment of the capillary plexus of the yolk sac, as well as the early development of the vasculature within the embryo proper, VEGF signaling is finely balanced to allow for the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells into the primitive vascular network (Leung et al., 1989; Klagsbrun and Soker, 1993; Dvorak et al., 1995; Petrova et al., 1999; Coultas et al., 2005; Shibuya and Claesson-Welsh, 2006). Furthermore, the Scl/T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia transcription factor (Scl), a member of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family, has been identified in the specification of Flk1 positive multipotent progenitors, which give rise to both blood and endothelial cells (Robb et al., 1995; Shivdasani et al., 1995; Porcher et al., 1996; Visvader et al., 1998). In fact, putative Scl binding sites have been found on the Flk1 promoter, suggesting that Scl directly acts as a regulator of Flk1 expression and multipotent properties of early endothelial and hematopoietic progenitor cells, critical for the establishment of the initial capillary plexus during vasculogenesis (Kappel et al., 2000). The development of this capillary network in the yolk sac is one of the first steps in the sequence of highly dynamic morphogenetic events that occur during early vascular development.

Angiogenesis and vascular remodeling in the mouse yolk sac

Once the primitive capillary plexus of the yolk sac is established by about E8.5, this honeycomb-like network of vessels undergo rapid morphological changes to adjust to the demands of the expanding yolk sac and growing embryo. This is an angiogenic process, where the established vessels remodel to expand and increase in diameter, and smaller vessels fuse to form the large major vessels of the yolk sac and embryo (Udan et al., 2013a). Concurrently, other vessels undergo pruning to eliminate excessive branches, intussusception to create branch points in large vessels, and nascent vessels sprout from existing larger vessels to form small capillary beds. This morphogenetic process, known as vascular remodeling, occurs between E8.5 and E9.5, and results in a hierarchically branched, highly organized vascular network (Figure 1C) that allows vessels to become low-resistance conduits for the transport of blood, oxygen, nutrients and waste to and from the yolk sac and embryo proper. This remodeling process is a critical time point required for the ability of the cardiovascular system to function and support the growing embryo; if the vessels are not remodeled correctly, the viability of the embryo is no longer sustainable. This process is regulated by both molecular and biomechanical signaling.

Some of the most studied and earliest identified molecular signaling pathways that are essential for angiogenesis are the Tie family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Expression analysis of Tie1 and Tie2 receptors show localization within the vasculature from the onset of angioblast specification (E7.0), continuing on through development and into adulthood. (Dumont et al., 1992, 1995; Sato et al., 1993; Schnurch and Risau, 1993; Korhonen et al., 1994). Furthermore, targeted mutations of Tie receptors in mice revealed significant impairments on vascular development during angiogenic processes, including yolk sac vascular remodeling (Dumont et al., 1994; Sato et al., 1995). Although Tie receptors were initially thought to be orphan receptors, extensive studies have identified four ligands that can bind to Tie receptors: angiopoietins 1–4, (Davis et al., 1996; Suri et al., 1996; Maisonpierre et al., 1997; Valenzuela et al., 1999). These ligands have also been shown to be necessary for the regulation of yolk sac vascular remodeling in the mouse embryo (Davis et al., 1996; Maisonpierre et al., 1997; Gale et al., 2002). These data identify the Tie family of receptors and ligands as critical molecular regulators of vascular remodeling during angiogenesis, after the initial establishment of the capillary plexus during vasculogenesis.

Another example of the molecular regulation of yolk sac angiogenesis and vascular remodeling is the transforming growth factor β superfamily (TGFβ), which encompasses transforming growth factors and receptors, bone morphogenetic proteins and activins (Jakobsson and van Meeteren, 2013). Homozygous deletion of TGFβ family members results in embryonic lethality by E10.5–E11.5, at which point the mice are shown to have an unremodeled yolk sac vasculature, defects in endothelial and hematopoietic differentiation, delayed angiogenesis and weak vessels (Letterio et al., 1994; Dickson et al., 1995; Oshima et al., 1996; Yang et al., 1999; Oh et al., 2000; Urness et al., 2000; Larsson et al., 2001).

These genetic experiments provide examples of the individual contribution of members of the TGFβ pathway to remodeling of the vasculature of the yolk sac and embryo. The fine balance of activation, localization and balance of TGFβ ligands, receptors, and downstream signal transduction molecules have all been shown to be critical regulators of angiogenesis, vascular remodeling and vessel stability in the mouse embryo during development.

At the conclusion of vascular remodeling, the vasculature of the yolk sac and embryo are subdivided into a highly organized, hierarchical network of structurally and functionally distinct arteries and veins, each with its own specialized purpose for the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the developing embryo. Although it has been hypothesized that the differential effects of hemodynamic force of blood flow on developing vessels is a major factor for the molecular distinction between arteries and veins (le Noble et al., 2004), molecular markers of arterial and venous cell fate have been identified in endothelial cells before the onset of hemodynamic force.

The earliest identified and most studied factors which regulate arterial/venous identity are the Eph receptors, a large family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their membrane-bound ligands, the ephrins (Klein, 2012). Analysis of EphrinB2 and its receptor EphB4 at the earliest stages of vascular development revealed compartmentalized expression of EphrinB2 within the endothelial cells of developing arteries, whereas expression of EphB4 is localized to venous endothelial cells (Wang et al., 1998), suggesting that the differences between arteries and veins are genetically pre-determined and are critical for proper vascular function during development. Furthermore, the phenotypic analysis of several knockout mice within the Eph family of receptors and ligands confirmed their essential role in vascular morphogenesis (Wang et al., 1998; Gerety et al., 1999; Adams et al., 2001; Gerety and Anderson, 2002). Researchers in the field describe the interaction between ephrinB2 and EphB4 as reciprocal, in which signaling between the arterial and venous compartments allows for the separation of arterial and venous cell fates, downstream of pathways that are necessary for the establishment of arterial and venous progenitors (Klein, 2012).

The Notch signaling pathway has been implicated as regulator of arterial and venous cell fate upstream of ephrin signaling. This family consists of the Notch receptors (Notch 1–4), which interact with the ligands Delta-like (Dll) 1, 3, 4, Jagged1 and Jagged2. Upon interaction between the ligand and its receptor, the intracellular domain of the receptor is cleaved, where it can translocate to the nucleus and activate transcription of target genes (Gridley, 2010). Analysis of Notch ligands and their receptors have identified expression in the endothelium, with many family members restricted to the arterial compartment (Villa et al., 2001). Targeted mutation of Notch pathway members in mice has provided further evidence that this pathway is key in regulating arterial endothelial cell identity and yolk sac vascular morphology (Conlon et al., 1995; Xue et al., 1999; Krebs et al., 2000; Fischer et al., 2004; Gale et al., 2004).

While the specification of arterial identity is regulated by a number of different transcription factors and signaling molecules, specification of venous cell fate is primarily mediated through the orphan nuclear receptor chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (CoupTFII). Targeted deletion of CoupTFII in mice results in an unremodeled yolk sac vasculature and defects in cardiac morphogenesis (Pereira et al., 1999). CoupTFII is expressed solely in the venous compartment of the endothelium, and upon conditional deletion of CoupTFII in endothelial cells, expression of arterial markers is observed within venous endothelial cells. Conversely, ectopic expression of CoupTFII results in the fusion of arteries and veins. The authors conclude that CoupTFII functions cell autonomously to suppress the activation of arterial regulators to maintain venous cell fate (You et al., 2005).

The specification and maintenance of arterial and venous identity is critical for viability as the embryo continues to grow. In the absence of functional arteries and veins, circulation can become impaired, highlighting the importance of the early genetic specification and patterning of these specialized endothelial cells before the onset of blood flow. Furthermore, after remodeling, the newly formed vessels of the yolk sac and embryo begin to stabilize through the recruitment of mural cells to the endothelium, including smooth muscle cells and perictyes. This recruitment is initiated by the secretion of platelet derived growth factor B (PDGFB) from endothelial cells, which in turn binds to PDGF receptors on the mural cell surface and allows them to contribute to the stabilization and formation of the vessel wall (Armulik et al., 2005; Gaengel et al., 2009).

The regulation of endothelial cells by hemodynamic force during vascular remodeling

Physical forces imparted by blood flow are known to regulate vascular remodeling within the yolk sac and embryo proper (Lucitti et al., 2007; Culver and Dickinson, 2010). In vitro analysis of how endothelial cells respond to mechanical force has been insightful in identifying mechanosensitive signal transduction pathways that can modulate endothelial cell morphology and function (Tzima et al., 2001, 2002, 2003; Osawa et al., 2002; Newman and Newman, 2003; Lehoux et al., 2006). For example, the application of shear stress, the frictional force of flowing blood dragging along the vessel wall, to cultured endothelial cells has been shown to activate a signal transduction complex composed of three receptors, VEGFR2 (Flk1), vascular endothelial cell cadherin (VE-cadherin), and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1) in vitro (Tzima et al., 2005). When a confluent monolayer of endothelial cells in culture is exposed to laminar (steady, non-turbulent) flow, endothelial cells realign parallel to the direction of flow. Although previous work had indicated this phenomenon was dependent solely on the activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K) pathway through Flk1 (Shay-Salit et al., 2002), the authors demonstrated that upon deletion of either VE-cadherin or PECAM1 in confluent endothelial monolayers exposed to flow, the cells were no longer able to respond to the shear stress and did not realign in the direction of flow. Furthermore, upon overexpression of Flk1, PECAM1, and VE-cadherin in cells which do not respond to mechanical shear stress normally, cells realigned parallel to the direction of flow, becoming mechanosensitive (Tzima et al., 2005). These data provided evidence of a molecular complex that is triggered solely by mechanical force, which serves as a necessary cue for the ability of endothelial cells to change morphology and polarity within a cultured monolayer. The authors concluded that the mechanism for activation of this mechanosensory complex is through direct transmission of mechanical force via PECAM1 to VE-cadherin, which acts as an adaptor protein activating Flk1 and catalyzing the activation of the PI3K signaling cascade. Furthermore, in vitro experiments using FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) biosensors showed increased force acting on PECAM1 at junctions upon the addition of shear stress, further supporting the idea of PECAM1 as a mechanosensitive signaling factor (Conway et al., 2013). Whether this complex is activated in a similar way in vivo has yet to be determined, but it is known that some of these receptors are essential for embryonic vascular development. As described earlier, Flk1 is critical for the earliest stages of both vasculogenesis and hematopoiesis (Shalaby et al., 1997), and VE-cadherin is necessary for vascular morphogenesis (Gory-Faure et al., 1999). However, while PECAM1 is expressed in the endothelium during embryonic vascular development, genetic deletion of this gene shows no deficiencies in vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, or vascular remodeling (Duncan et al., 1999), indicating the mechanism by which hemodynamic force regulates vascular remodeling in vivo may rely on additional factors. Furthermore, several in vitro experiments performed to determine the mechanism behind the mechanosensitivity of endothelial cells have identified a wide array of proteins, including ion channels, G-protein coupled receptors, nitric oxide release molecules, and signaling transduction pathways, all of which may play a potential role in the regulation of vascular remodeling in vivo (Lehoux et al., 2006; Culver and Dickinson, 2010).

The characterization and quantification of how hemodynamic force regulates mouse yolk sac vascular remodeling in vivo has been largely aided by the application of imaging techniques and live embryo culture, which will be discussed later in this review (Jones et al., 2004, 2005; Larina et al., 2008, 2009a; Udan et al., 2013b). It is known that in the mouse, upon the initiation of the heartbeat at E8.25 (~3 somites) and the entry of blood cells into the circulation (~6 somites), hemodynamic force plays a critical role in the regulation of endothelial cell function and vascular remodeling, forming a low-resistance, highly organized yolk sac vasculature. The direct role of the onset of blood flow at this early stage of vascular development has been studied for several years and is still highly debated; some suggested that blood flow is necessary for the transport of oxygen to the growing embryonic tissue, while others suspected blood flow in the nascent vasculature is required for the transport of soluble nutrients and growth factors essential for proper endothelial cell function (Conway et al., 2003). However, it was also increasingly clear through in vitro experiments that shear stress, and therefore hemodynamic force, is a critical physical factor in the regulation of endothelial cell function. Shear stress (τ), the primary hemodynamic force required for vessel remodeling, is quantified by multiplying the apparent viscosity (μapp) of blood by the shear rate (γ), which is dependent on the velocity gradient of blood flow at the vessel wall and the vessel radius (Jones et al., 2004). Based on this definition, deficiencies in heart development, cardiac output, or hematopoiesis in the developing embryo affect the shear stress on a vessel wall, which can in turn significantly affect endothelial cell function and the ability of vessels to remodel during development.

Indeed, a number of mice with mutations causing deficiencies in early cardiac development and function are embryonic lethal due to impairments in vascular remodeling (Tanaka et al., 1999; Wakimoto et al., 2000; Koushik et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2003; May et al., 2004). For example, mutation of the gene atrial myosin light chain 2a (mlc2a), a structural component of the atrial myofibrillar apparatus, confers significantly reduced atrial contraction and reduced hemodynamic force (low, oscillatory flow), resulting in lethality by E10.5–11.5. Not only do embryos display cardiac morphogenesis abnormalities, but also a completely unremodeled yolk sac vasculature at E9.5 (Huang et al., 2003). Similarly, deletion of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (Ncx1) causes a complete lack of heartbeat and shows deficiencies in vascular remodeling (Wakimoto et al., 2000; Koushik et al., 2001). Furthermore, deletion of the homeobox transcription factor Nkx2.5, a regulator of dorsal mesoderm specification, results in impaired cardiac development after looping, defects in vascular remodeling in the yolk sac and embryo, and impairments in hematopoiesis. Interestingly, the authors demonstrated through chimera studies that vascular remodeling failure can be rescued if wild type Nkx2.5 cardiomyocytes constitute greater than 85% of the heart (Tanaka et al., 1999), suggesting that cardiac function alone can play a significant role in the ability of vessels to remodel. Finally, embryos with mutations in the cardiomyocyte protein Titin, which acts as a spring during muscle contraction, have impaired blood flow, and endothelial cells of the yolk sac and embryo proper display defects in cell morphology, including irregular cell-cell contact and abnormal spatial distribution during vasculogenesis and angiogenesis (May et al., 2004). These data demonstrate the significance of cardiac output and its contribution to hemodynamic force during vascular development. In the absence of a strong heartbeat and the corresponding pulsatile, forward movement of blood flow within the capillary plexus, vessels within the yolk sac fail to remodel, and the embryo can no longer sustain growth resulting in lethality.

Shear stress imparted on blood vessels is dependent not only on blood velocity/cardiac output, but also on blood viscosity, which is correlated with the concentration of red blood cells within the circulation. The entry of blood cells into the embryonic circulation at ~6 somites is a necessary physiological cue for the induction of vascular remodeling. A number of gene mutations have been reported that result in the absence of hematopoietic development, where as a consequence, the vasculature fails to remodel (Robb et al., 1995; Matsumoto et al., 2006; He et al., 2008; Satyanarayana et al., 2010). For example, knockout of Scl, which encodes a bHLH transcription factor identified in T-cell leukemia, results in lethality by E9.5, due to significant developmental delay, edema, a complete absence of hematopoiesis, and an unremodeled yolk sac vasculature, suggesting that a significant reduction in blood development can impair yolk sac vascular remodeling (Robb et al., 1995). Similarly, deletion of the transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 6 (Klf6), which regulates cell proliferation, resulted in a drastic reduction in hematopoietic cell production and a poorly organized yolk sac vasculature. Upon the production of Klf6−/− embryonic stem cells, it was determined that Klf6 deletion resulted in a reduced capacity in hematopoietic lineage differentiation, while endothelial cell differentiation and expression remained unchanged (Matsumoto et al., 2006). More recently, deletion of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor RapGEF2, which activates Rap1, resulted in severe defects in yolk sac vascular remodeling. Although the vasculature failed to remodel, there were no changes in Flk1+ (endothelial) cells within the yolk sac, but a significant reduction in CD41+ (hematopoietic) cells, indicating the early blood and endothelial cell progenitors are still present, but maintenance of hematopoiesis no longer occurs (Satyanarayana et al., 2010). Also, conditional deletion of the proto-oncogene, c-myc in early blood and endothelial cell precursors resulted in a lack of early hematopoietic lineages, an impairment in definitive hematopoiesis, and deficient angiogenesis and yolk sac vascular remodeling. Furthermore, conditional c-myc deletion played no role in the establishment of the vascular plexus during angiogenesis, and had no effect on endothelial cell proliferation, migration or survival (He et al., 2008). These data indicate that the development of blood cells and their entry into the circulation at the onset of cardiac contraction is a physical trigger necessary for regulating dynamic endothelial cell function during vascular remodeling.

While there is strong evidence that cardiac output and the viscosity of blood are both necessary mechanical triggers for the activation of vascular remodeling through shear stress, until the past decade, there was no definitive answer to whether the onset of blood flow triggered yolk sac vascular remodeling through a purely mechanical mechanism in the mouse embryo. To answer this question in vivo, primitive erythroblasts were sequestered to the blood islands in cultured wild type embryos before the onset of blood flow through acrylamide polymerization, which reduced viscosity and shear stress within the circulation. In the absence of circulating red blood cells in cultured wild type embryos, the yolk sac capillary plexus did not remodel, and expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), a known mechanosensitive protein, was significantly reduced. Furthermore, the remodeling defects and decreased eNOS expression levels observed in the cultured embryos with sequestered erythroblasts were rescued by the injection of a viscous material, hetastarch, into the circulation, which compensated for the lack of circulating blood cells (Lucitti et al., 2007). These studies show that the physical trigger of hemodynamic force and shear stress acting upon the endothelium is both necessary and sufficient to activate vascular remodeling in the mouse yolk sac.

Live imaging of vascular remodeling and hemodynamics in the mouse embryo

Traditional developmental biology approaches to understanding how the vasculature changes over time during remodeling have taken advantage of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to observe protein and gene expression within the endothelium at fixed time points. However, limiting observation to snapshots in time using these methods does not allow us to capture the complex, dynamic spatio-temporal changes of the remodeling vasculature. Since the advent of fluorescent proteins and genetic manipulation, the use of imaging techniques has been widely adapted for live analysis, such as cell migration, membrane dynamics, proliferation, and apoptosis. In vivo analysis of such cellular properties in the mouse during early development remains a significant challenge, due to the closed nature of mammalian in utero development. Within the past decade, mouse developmental biologists have begun to circumvent this limitation by combining embryo culture with imaging techniques to study vascular morphogenesis and hemodynamics in living embryos (Jones et al., 2004, 2005; Lucitti et al., 2007; Larina et al., 2008, 2009a; Garcia et al., 2011; Udan et al., 2013b).

Confocal microscopy has been used to image dynamic changes within the mouse yolk sac vasculature during remodeling. Transgenic mice expressing endothelial specific fluorescent reporters labeling the nucleus (Flk1-H2B::YFP) (Fraser et al., 2005) and the membrane (Flk1-myr::mCherry) (Larina et al., 2009b) have provided a straightforward imaging method to assess cell migration and vascular morphogenesis in cultured embryos (Figure 2). Embryonic imaging of these models in static culture on the imaging stage allows for visualization of the vasculature outline (labeled by the mCherry reporter) and tracking of all endothelial cells within the field of view, and has been used to study how endothelial cells respond to hemodynamic force during vascular remodeling (Udan et al., 2013b). Through time-lapse confocal microscopy, it has been shown that vessel diameter increases observed in the yolk sac vitelline artery during vascular remodeling are dependent on hemodynamic force, and are due to directed endothelial cell migration and vessel fusion events. Furthermore, when analyzing endothelial cell dynamics in blood flow-impaired mutant mice, the ability of endothelial cells to migrate and fuse to form larger vessels was lost. The dynamic endothelial behaviors observed using live imaging techniques have contributed to our knowledge of how endothelial cells respond to mechanical forces within the yolk sac during development, and highlighted the potential of live imaging for a more complete understanding of vascular morphogenesis in mouse embryos.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In vivo labeling of the yolk sac vasculature using vital fluorescent reporters. The embryonic yolk sac vasculature of transgenic mice, labeling the membrane (Flk1-myr::mCherry), and nuclei (Flk1-H2B::YFP) of endothelial cells. (A,B) Vascular plexus of the embryonic yolk sac at E8.5 at 10× and 40× (oil) magnification, respectively.

Time lapse microscopy of morphogenetic processes that occur over several hours can be easily performed using any number of conventional fluorescent microscopes. However, capturing the rapid, dynamic movement of blood flowing through a vessel using fluorescence microscopy can be challenging due to the high frame rate needed to resolve individual blood cells in time. Traditional confocal microscopes can be used for the acquisition and quantification of blood flow by repetitive, single line-scanning either parallel or perpendicular to the direction of flow (Dirnagl et al., 1992; Kleinfeld et al., 1998; Jones et al., 2004). However, this imaging technique provides a limited number of data points and rigorous validation. The development of line-scanning confocal microscopes allows for the rapid, real-time acquisition of blood flow in vivo (Dirnagl et al., 1992; Kleinfeld et al., 1998; Jones et al., 2004; Larina and Dickinson, 2012). Through the use of slits instead of conventional pinholes, line scanning confocal microscopes such as the Zeiss LSM 7 LIVE, which utilizes line illumination and a linear detector, have a frame rate of up to 120 frames per second. This rapid frame acquisition is ideal for imaging and tracking individual blood cells within a vessel over multiple frames for the quantification of blood velocity in the mouse yolk sac. Blood cells can be visualized in cultured embryos using the transgenic reporter mouse ε-globin-GFP, which brightly labels primitive erythroblasts during embryonic development (Figure 3A) (Dyer et al., 2001). Such fast frame rates allow cells to be easily distinguishable and traceable (Figure 3B), allowing a large number of cells per time lapse to be used for hemodynamic quantification, including peak blood velocity, average blood velocity, full blood velocity profiles, and heart rate (Figure 3C). This imaging technique provides a powerful tool for studying mouse mutants with impairments in vascular remodeling, helping to determine the direct cause of remodeling failure and distinguish between poor hemodynamics and endothelial cell dysfunction.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hemodynamic analysis in the embryonic yolk sac. (A) Cultured embryos with erythrocytes labeled using the ε-globin-GFP transgene near the blood islands at E8.5. (B) Tracks of all cells detected using image processing software during the movie represented in (A). The colored lines represent the position of the blood cells over the course of the time lapse. (C) Plot of individual cell velocities over the course of the time lapse. This allows for the quantification of average blood velocity, peak blood velocity, velocity profiles, and heart rate.

Visualization of blood flow using confocal microscopy requires the use of fluorescent reporters or dyes through transgenic mice and/or embryo manipulation, which require time for breeding or is invasive. An alternative optical imaging technique, optical coherence tomography (OCT) takes advantage of interferometry to acquire images using natural optical tissue contrast, and does not require fluorescent proteins, dyes or contrast agents. OCT has the capability of imaging 2–3 mm into tissue, which enables deeper imaging within the cultured embryo, though with lower spatial resolution (~2–15 μm). We previously described the use of Doppler OCT to directly quantify blood velocity in the superficial vessels of the yolk sac, as well as deeper vessels within cultured embryos at E8.5 and E9.5 (Figure 4) (Chen et al., 1997). If the direction of the blood flow is known, blood flow at each pixel of an OCT image can be reconstructed. During vascular remodeling, blood velocity within the yolk sac and embryonic vessels is robust, allowing for a strong Doppler signal and an easy and reliable measurement of blood velocity in cultured embryos. Doppler OCT images are pseudocolored to indicate opposing blood flow directions in vessels (Figures 4A,B). Velocity measurements across both vessels result in a distinct parabolic velocity profile associated with blood flow, with the peak blood velocities at the center of the vessel, similar to that observed using confocal microscopy (Figures 4C,E). Analysis and quantification of the cardiac cycle can be performed by plotting the peak blood velocity observed within the vessel over time (Figures 4D,F). Hemodynamic data obtained by Doppler OCT in cultured mouse embryos has been validated as comparable to measurements made using fast-scanning confocal microscopy (Jones et al., 2004; Larina et al., 2008). Furthermore, while hemodynamic analysis of extraembryonic yolk sac vessels is relatively simple using confocal microscopy, the imaging depth limitations associated with fluorescence microscopy does not allow analysis of vessels deep within the embryo; this problem can be overcome using OCT. Also, analysis of OCT speckle variance within vessels in cultured embryos can be used to reconstruct the 3-D structure of the yolk sac and embryonic vasculature (Sudheendran et al., 2011; Mahmud et al., 2013). The development and use of OCT as an imaging tool for cultured embryos, specifically for cardiodynamic assessment, allows scientists to image deeper into the embryo without the need for fluorescent reporters, dyes or contrast agents, to answer fundamental questions about cardiovascular form and function in living mammalian embryos.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Live hemodynamic analysis with Doppler OCT in cultured mouse embryos at E9.5. (A) Structural image of an E9.5 embryo showing fragments of the yolk sac and embryonic trunk. (B) Corresponding color-coded Doppler OCT image showing strong signals produced by blood flow in the yolk sac vessel and dorsal aorta. Different colors indicate opposite directions of the flow in these structures. (C,E) Blood flow velocity profiles and (D,F) dynamics of the peak blood flow velocity in the yolk sac vessel and dorsal aorta, respectively, measured along the lines shown in (A) at different phases of the heartbeat cycle. Adapted from Larina et al. (2008).

Conclusion

Vascular remodeling, in which the primitive capillary plexus of the yolk sac is remodeled to form a branched hierarchical network of arteries, veins, and capillary beds, is a critical step in early cardiovascular development. As described in this review, impairments in this process can be due to defects in endothelial cell function that can inhibit the ability of the vasculature to respond to cues from signaling molecules, nutrients or physical forces. Secondarily, defects in hemodynamic force, either through altered cardiac output or hematocrit content, can also inhibit the ability of the vasculature to remodel. Although yolk sac vascular remodeling defects are fairly common, it is often the case that the direct cell type or mechanism for the impaired remodeling phenotype is not fully understood. Conditional knockout approaches directly targeting endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, and/or hematopoietic cells, as well as imaging techniques, such as those described in this review, for in vivo analysis of hemodynamics and endothelial cell migration are all necessary when understanding the mechanism behind the complex morphological and molecular events that occur during vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vascular remodeling.

Basic research in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis has been supported by its clinical relevance, in which we can adapt what we learn to disease states such as cancer, atherosclerosis, and osteoporosis. Although a lot is known about the signal transduction pathways that regulate both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, new genes are discovered every day, which can contribute to the regulation of endothelial cell function, vascular morphogenesis, and vascular homeostasis. Continuing studies that take advantage of animal disease models and genetic manipulations will be necessary to continue to elucidate the complexities of signal transduction and gene regulation during embryonic vascular development, to provide new gene targets and therapeutics for health intervention in the clinic.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams R. H., Diella F., Hennig S., Helmbacher F., Deutsch U., Klein R. (2001). The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand ephrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not cranial neural crest migration. Cell 104, 57–69 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00191-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armulik A., Abramsson A., Betsholtz C. (2005). Endothelial/pericyte interactions. Circ. Res. 97, 512–523 10.1161/01.RES.0000182903.16652.d7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carmeliet P. (2003). Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat. Med. 9, 653–660 10.1038/nm0603-653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Z., Milner T. E., Srinivas S., Wang X., Malekafzali A., van Gemert M. J., et al. (1997). Noninvasive imaging of in vivo blood flow velocity using optical Doppler tomography. Opt. Lett. 22, 1119–1121 10.1364/OL.22.001119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conlon R. A., Reaume A. G., Rossant J. (1995). Notch1 is required for the coordinate segmentation of somites. Development 121, 1533–1545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conway D. E., Breckenridge M. T., Hinde E., Gratton E., Chen C. S., Schwartz M. A. (2013). Fluid shear stress on endothelial cells modulates mechanical tension across VE-cadherin and PECAM-1. Curr. Biol. 23, 1024–1030 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conway S. J., Kruzynska-Frejtag A., Kneer P. L., Machnicki M., Koushik S. V. (2003). What cardiovascular defect does my prenatal mouse mutant have, and why? Genesis 35, 1–21 10.1002/gene.10152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coultas L., Chawengsaksophak K., Rossant J. (2005). Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature 438, 937–945 10.1038/nature04479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Culver J. C., Dickinson M. E. (2010). The effects of hemodynamic force on embryonic development. Microcirculation 17, 164–178 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00025.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis S., Aldrich T. H., Jones P. F., Acheson A., Compton D. L., Jain V., et al. (1996). Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell 87, 1161–1169 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81812-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dickson M. C., Martin J. S., Cousins F. M., Kulkarni A. B., Karlsson S., Akhurst R. J. (1995). Defective haematopoiesis and vasculogenesis in transforming growth factor-β 1 knock out mice. Development 121, 1845–1854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dirnagl U., Villringer A., Einhaupl K. M. (1992). In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of the cerebral microcirculation. J. Microsc. 165, 147–157 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1992.tb04312.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drake C. J., Fleming P. A. (2000). Vasculogenesis in the day 6.5 to 9.5 mouse embryo. Blood 95, 1671–1679 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dumont D. J., Fong G. H., Puri M. C., Gradwohl G., Alitalo K., Breitman M. L. (1995). Vascularization of the mouse embryo: a study of flk-1, tek, tie, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression during development. Dev. Dyn. 203, 80–92 10.1002/aja.1002030109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dumont D. J., Gradwohl G., Fong G. H., Puri M. C., Gertsenstein M., Auerbach A., et al. (1994). Dominant-negative and targeted null mutations in the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase, tek, reveal a critical role in vasculogenesis of the embryo. Genes Dev. 8, 1897–1909 10.1101/gad.8.16.1897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dumont D. J., Yamaguchi T. P., Conlon R. A., Rossant J., Breitman M. L. (1992). tek, a novel tyrosine kinase gene located on mouse chromosome 4, is expressed in endothelial cells and their presumptive precursors. Oncogene 7, 1471–1480 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duncan G. S., Andrew D. P., Takimoto H., Kaufman S. A., Yoshida H., Spellberg J., et al. (1999). Genetic evidence for functional redundancy of Platelet/Endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1): CD31-deficient mice reveal PECAM-1-dependent and PECAM-1-independent functions. J. Immunol. 162, 3022–3030 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dvorak H. F., Brown L. F., Detmar M., Dvorak A. M. (1995). Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 146, 1029–1039 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dyer M. A., Farrington S. M., Mohn D., Munday J. R., Baron M. H. (2001). Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo. Development 128, 1717–1730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fischer A., Schumacher N., Maier M., Sendtner M., Gessler M. (2004). The Notch target genes Hey1 and Hey2 are required for embryonic vascular development. Genes Dev. 18, 901–911 10.1101/gad.291004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fraser S. T., Hadjantonakis A. K., Sahr K. E., Willey S., Kelly O. G., Jones E. A., et al. (2005). Using a histone yellow fluorescent protein fusion for tagging and tracking endothelial cells in ES cells and mice. Genesis 42, 162–171 10.1002/gene.20139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaengel K., Genove G., Armulik A., Betsholtz C. (2009). Endothelial-mural cell signaling in vascular development and angiogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29, 630–638 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.161521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gale N. W., Dominguez M. G., Noguera I., Pan L., Hughes V., Valenzuela D. M., et al. (2004). Haploinsufficiency of delta-like 4 ligand results in embryonic lethality due to major defects in arterial and vascular development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 15949–15954 10.1073/pnas.0407290101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gale N. W., Thurston G., Hackett S. F., Renard R., Wang Q., McClain J., et al. (2002). Angiopoietin-2 is required for postnatal angiogenesis and lymphatic patterning, and only the latter role is rescued by Angiopoietin-1. Dev. Cell 3, 411–423 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00217-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Garcia M. D., Udan R. S., Hadjantonakis A. K., Dickinson M. E. (2011). Live imaging of mouse embryos. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 366–372 10.1101/pdb.top104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerety S. S., Anderson D. J. (2002). Cardiovascular ephrinB2 function is essential for embryonic angiogenesis. Development 129, 1397–1410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gerety S. S., Wang H. U., Chen Z. F., Anderson D. J. (1999). Symmetrical mutant phenotypes of the receptor EphB4 and its specific transmembrane ligand ephrin-B2 in cardiovascular development. Mol. Cell 4, 403–414 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80342-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gory-Faure S., Prandini M. H., Pointu H., Roullot V., Pignot-Paintrand I., Vernet M., et al. (1999). Role of vascular endothelial-cadherin in vascular morphogenesis. Development 126, 2093–2102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gridley T. (2010). Chapter nine - notch signaling in the vasculature, in Current Topics in Developmental Biology, ed Raphael K. (Waltham, MA: Academic Press; ), 277–309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. He C., Hu H., Braren R., Fong S.-Y., Trumpp A., Carlson T. R., et al. (2008). c-myc in the hematopoietic lineage is crucial for its angiogenic function in the mouse embryo. Development 135, 2467–2477 10.1242/dev.020131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang C., Sheikh F., Hollander M., Cai C., Becker D., Chu P.-H., et al. (2003). Embryonic atrial function is essential for mouse embryogenesis, cardiac morphogenesis and angiogenesis. Development 130, 6111–6119 10.1242/dev.00831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jakobsson L., van Meeteren L. A. (2013). Transforming growth factor β family members in regulation of vascular function: in the light of vascular conditional knockouts. Exp. Cell Res. 319, 1264–1270 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones E. A., Baron M. H., Fraser S. E., Dickinson M. E. (2005). Dynamic in vivo imaging of mammalian hematovascular development using whole embryo culture. Methods Mol. Med. 105, 381–394 10.1385/1-59259-826-9:381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jones E. A. V., Baron M. H., Fraser S. E., Dickinson M. E. (2004). Measuring hemodynamic changes during mammalian development. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287, H1561–H1569 10.1152/ajpheart.00081.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kappel A., Schlaeger T. M., Flamme I., Orkin S. H., Risau W., Breier G. (2000). Role of SCL/Tal-1, GATA, and ets transcription factor binding sites for the regulation of flk-1 expression during murine vascular development. Blood 96, 3078–3085 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Klagsbrun M., Soker S. (1993). VEGF/VPF: the angiogenesis factor found? Curr. Biol. 3, 699–702 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90073-W [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Klein R. (2012). Eph/ephrin signalling during development. Development 139, 4105–4109 10.1242/dev.074997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kleinfeld D., Mitra P. P., Helmchen F., Denk W. (1998). Fluctuations and stimulus-induced changes in blood flow observed in individual capillaries in layers 2 through 4 of rat neocortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 15741–15746 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Korhonen J., Polvi A., Partanen J., Alitalo K. (1994). The mouse tie receptor tyrosine kinase gene: expression during embryonic angiogenesis. Oncogene 9, 395–403 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Koushik S. V., Wang J., Rogers R., Moskophidis D., Lambert N. A., Creazzo T. L., et al. (2001). Targeted inactivation of the sodium-calcium exchanger (Ncx1) results in the lack of a heartbeat and abnormal myofibrillar organization. FASEB J. 15, 1209–1211 10.1096/fj.00-0696fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Krebs L. T., Xue Y., Norton C. R., Shutter J. R., Maguire M., Sundberg J. P., et al. (2000). Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev. 14, 1343–1352 10.1101/gad.14.11.1343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Larina I. V., Dickinson M. E. (2012). In vivo imaging of the developing mouse embryonic vasculature. Methods Mol. Biol. 872, 205–215 10.1007/978-1-61779-797-2_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Larina I. V., Ivers S., Syed S., Dickinson M. E., Larin K. V. (2009a). Hemodynamic measurements from individual blood cells in early mammalian embryos with Doppler swept source OCT. Opt. Lett. 34, 986–988 10.1364/OL.34.000986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Larina I. V., Shen W., Kelly O. G., Hadjantonakis A. K., Baron M. H., Dickinson M. E. (2009b). A membrane associated mCherry fluorescent reporter line for studying vascular remodeling and cardiac function during murine embryonic development. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken). 292, 333–341 10.1002/ar.20821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Larina I. V., Sudheendran N., Ghosn M., Jiang J., Cable A., Larin K. V., et al. (2008). Live imaging of blood flow in mammalian embryos using Doppler swept-source optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 13:060506 10.1117/1.3046716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Larsson J., Goumans M. J., Sjostrand L. J., van Rooijen M. A., Ward D., Leveen P., et al. (2001). Abnormal angiogenesis but intact hematopoietic potential in TGF-beta type I receptor-deficient mice. EMBO J. 20, 1663–1673 10.1093/emboj/20.7.1663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lehoux S., Castier Y., Tedgui A. (2006). Molecular mechanisms of the vascular responses to haemodynamic forces. J. Intern. Med. 259, 381–392 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01624.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. le Noble F., Moyon D., Pardanaud L., Yuan L., Djonov V., Matthijsen R., et al. (2004). Flow regulates arterial-venous differentiation in the chick embryo yolk sac. Development 131, 361–375 10.1242/dev.00929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Letterio J. J., Geiser A. G., Kulkarni A. B., Roche N. S., Sporn M. B., Roberts A. B. (1994). Maternal rescue of transforming growth factor-beta 1 null mice. Science 264, 1936–1938 10.1126/science.8009224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Leung D. W., Cachianes G., Kuang W. J., Goeddel D. V., Ferrara N. (1989). Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 246, 1306–1309 10.1126/science.2479986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lucitti J. L., Jones E. A. V., Huang C., Chen J., Fraser S. E., Dickinson M. E. (2007). Vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac requires hemodynamic force. Development 134, 3317–3326 10.1242/dev.02883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mahmud M. S., Cadotte D. W., Vuong B., Sun C., Luk T. W., Mariampillai A., et al. (2013). Review of speckle and phase variance optical coherence tomography to visualize microvascular networks. J. Biomed. Opt. 18:50901 10.1117/1.JBO.18.5.050901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Maisonpierre P. C., Suri C., Jones P. F., Bartunkova S., Wiegand S. J., Radziejewski C., et al. (1997). Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science 277, 55–60 10.1126/science.277.5322.55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Matsumoto N., Kubo A., Liu H., Akita K., Laub F., Ramirez F., et al. (2006). Developmental regulation of yolk sac hematopoiesis by Kruppel-like factor 6. Blood 107, 1357–1365 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. May S. R., Stewart N. J., Chang W., Peterson A. S. (2004). A Titin mutation defines roles for circulation in endothelial morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 270, 31–46 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Newman P. J., Newman D. K. (2003). Signal transduction pathways mediated by PECAM-1: new roles for an old molecule in platelet and vascular cell biology. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 23, 953–964 10.1161/01.ATV.0000071347.69358.D9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nowotschin S., Hadjantonakis A. K. (2010). Cellular dynamics in the early mouse embryo: from axis formation to gastrulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 420–427 10.1016/j.gde.2010.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Oh S. P., Seki T., Goss K. A., Imamura T., Yi Y., Donahoe P. K., et al. (2000). Activin receptor-like kinase 1 modulates transforming growth factor-beta 1 signaling in the regulation of angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 2626–2631 10.1073/pnas.97.6.2626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Osawa M., Masuda M., Kusano K.-I., Fujiwara K. (2002). Evidence for a role of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 in endothelial cell mechanosignal transduction: is it a mechanoresponsive molecule? J. Cell Biol. 158, 773–785 10.1083/jcb.200205049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Oshima M., Oshima H., Taketo M. M. (1996). TGF-beta receptor type II deficiency results in defects of yolk sac hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Dev. Biol. 179, 297–302 10.1006/dbio.1996.0259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pereira F. A., Qiu Y., Zhou G., Tsai M. J., Tsai S. Y. (1999). The orphan nuclear receptor COUP-TFII is required for angiogenesis and heart development. Genes Dev. 13, 1037–1049 10.1101/gad.13.8.1037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Petrova T. V., Makinen T., Alitalo K. (1999). Signaling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Exp. Cell Res. 253, 117–130 10.1006/excr.1999.4707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Poole T. J., Finkelstein E. B., Cox C. M. (2001). The role of FGF and VEGF in angioblast induction and migration during vascular development. Dev. Dyn. 220, 1–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Porcher C., Swat W., Rockwell K., Fujiwara Y., Alt F. W., Orkin S. H. (1996). The T cell leukemia oncoprotein SCL/tal-1 is essential for development of all hematopoietic lineages. Cell 86, 47–57 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80076-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Risau W. (1997). Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature 386, 671–674 10.1038/386671a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Risau W., Flamme I. (1995). Vasculogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 73–91 10.1146/annurev.cb.11.110195.000445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Robb L., Lyons I., Li R., Hartley L., Köntgen F., Harvey R. P., et al. (1995). Absence of yolk sac hematopoiesis from mice with a targeted disruption of the scl gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 7075–7079 10.1073/pnas.92.15.7075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sato T. N., Qin Y., Kozak C. A., Audus K. L. (1993). Tie-1 and tie-2 define another class of putative receptor tyrosine kinase genes expressed in early embryonic vascular system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9355–9358 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sato T. N., Tozawa Y., Deutsch U., Wolburg-Buchholz K., Fujiwara Y., Gendron-Maguire M., et al. (1995). Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature 376, 70–74 10.1038/376070a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Satyanarayana A., Gudmundsson K. O., Chen X., Coppola V., Tessarollo L., Keller J. R., et al. (2010). RapGEF2 is essential for embryonic hematopoiesis but dispensable for adult hematopoiesis. Blood 116, 2921–2931 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schnurch H., Risau W. (1993). Expression of tie-2, a member of a novel family of receptor tyrosine kinases, in the endothelial cell lineage. Development 119, 957–968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Shalaby F., Ho J., Stanford W. L., Fischer K. D., Schuh A. C., Schwartz L., et al. (1997). A requirement for Flk1 in primitive and definitive hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Cell 89, 981–990 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80283-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Shay-Salit A., Shushy M., Wolfovitz E., Yahav H., Breviario F., Dejana E., et al. (2002). VEGF receptor 2 and the adherens junction as a mechanical transducer in vascular endothelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 9462–9467 10.1073/pnas.142224299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Shibuya M., Claesson-Welsh L. (2006). Signal transduction by VEGF receptors in regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 549–560 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Shivdasani R. A., Mayer E. L., Orkin S. H. (1995). Absence of blood formation in mice lacking the T-cell leukaemia oncoprotein tal-1/SCL. Nature 373, 432–434 10.1038/373432a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Solnica-Krezel L., Sepich D. S. (2012). Gastrulation: making and shaping germ layers. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 687–717 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sudheendran N., Syed S. H., Dickinson M. E., Larina I. V., Larin K. V. (2011). Speckle variance OCT imaging of the vasculature in live mammalian embryos. Laser Phys. Lett. 8, 247–252 10.1002/lapl.201010120 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Suri C., Jones P. F., Patan S., Bartunkova S., Maisonpierre P. C., Davis S., et al. (1996). Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell 87, 1171–1180 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81813-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Tanaka M., Chen Z., Bartunkova S., Yamasaki N., Izumo S. (1999). The cardiac homeobox gene Csx/Nkx2.5 lies genetically upstream of multiple genes essential for heart development. Development 126, 1269–1280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Tzima E., Del Pozo M. A., Kiosses W. B., Mohamed S. A., Li S., Chien S., et al. (2002). Activation of Rac1 by shear stress in endothelial cells mediates both cytoskeletal reorganization and effects on gene expression. EMBO J. 21, 6791–6800 10.1093/emboj/cdf688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Tzima E., del Pozo M. A., Shattil S. J., Chien S., Schwartz M. A. (2001). Activation of integrins in endothelial cells by fluid shear stress mediates Rho-dependent cytoskeletal alignment. EMBO J. 20, 4639–4647 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tzima E., Irani-Tehrani M., Kiosses W. B., Dejana E., Schultz D. A., Engelhardt B., et al. (2005). A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 437, 426–431 10.1038/nature03952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Tzima E., Kiosses W. B., del Pozo M. A., Schwartz M. A. (2003). Localized Cdc42 activation, detected using a novel assay, mediates microtubule organizing center positioning in endothelial cells in response to fluid shear stress. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31020–31023 10.1074/jbc.M301179200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Udan R. S., Culver J. C., Dickinson M. E. (2013a). Understanding vascular development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 327–346 10.1002/wdev.91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Udan R. S., Vadakkan T. J., Dickinson M. E. (2013b). Dynamic responses of endothelial cells to changes in blood flow during vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac. Development 140, 4041–4050 10.1242/dev.096255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Urness L. D., Sorensen L. K., Li D. Y. (2000). Arteriovenous malformations in mice lacking activin receptor-like kinase-1. Nat. Genet. 26, 328–331 10.1038/81634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Valenzuela D. M., Griffiths J. A., Rojas J., Aldrich T. H., Jones P. F., Zhou H., et al. (1999). Angiopoietins 3 and 4: diverging gene counterparts in mice and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 1904–1909 10.1073/pnas.96.5.1904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Villa N., Walker L., Lindsell C. E., Gasson J., Iruela-Arispe M. L., Weinmaster G. (2001). Vascular expression of Notch pathway receptors and ligands is restricted to arterial vessels. Mech. Dev. 108, 161–164 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00469-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Visvader J. E., Fujiwara Y., Orkin S. H. (1998). Unsuspected role for the T-cell leukemia protein SCL/tal-1 in vascular development. Genes Dev. 12, 473–479 10.1101/gad.12.4.473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wakimoto K., Kobayashi K., Kuro-o M., Yao A., Iwamoto T., Yanaka N., et al. (2000). Targeted disruption of Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger gene leads to cardiomyocyte apoptosis and defects in heartbeat. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36991–36998 10.1074/jbc.M004035200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang H. U., Chen Z. F., Anderson D. J. (1998). Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell 93, 741–753 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81436-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Xue Y., Gao X., Lindsell C. E., Norton C. R., Chang B., Hicks C., et al. (1999). Embryonic lethality and vascular defects in mice lacking the notch ligand jagged1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 723–730 10.1093/hmg/8.5.723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yang X., Castilla L. H., Xu X., Li C., Gotay J., Weinstein M., et al. (1999). Angiogenesis defects and mesenchymal apoptosis in mice lacking SMAD5. Development 126, 1571–1580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. You L.-R., Lin F.-J., Lee C. T., DeMayo F. J., Tsai M.-J., Tsai S. Y. (2005). Suppression of Notch signalling by the COUP-TFII transcription factor regulates vein identity. Nature 435, 98–104 10.1038/nature03511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES