Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 15;5(5):717–723. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i5.717

Table 3.

Multiple regression model between taste sentitivity and nutri-metabolic parameters

Sour Bitter Salty BMI BF%1 Waist1 MetS1 MetS criteria1
Sour - - - 0.20a 0.05 0.27c 0.21a 0.21a
Bitter 0.34f - - 0.14 -0.09 -0.13 0.02 0.03
Salty 0.26c 0.23b - 0.10 -0.08 -0.11 0.23a 0.19
Sweet 0.24d 0.33f 0.26c 0.15 -0.15 0.10 0.08 -0.01
GTAS - - - -0.13a -0.15 -0.05 -0.08 -0.11
1

For BF%, waist circumference, presence of metabolic MetS and the number of MetS criteria correlations refer to overweight/obese patients (n = 93). Values are standardized coefficients adjusted for age and sex,

a

P < 0.05;

b

P < 0.01;

c

P <0.002;

d

P < 0.005;

f

P < 0.001, between BMI and both sour taste and GTAS, with lower sensitivity with increasing BMI. BMI: Body mass index; BF%: Percentage of body fat mass; MetS: Metabolic syndrome; GTAS: Global Taste Acuity Score.