. 2014 May 1;7(5):e10019. doi: 10.5812/jjm.10019

Table 1. Comparison of the Degree of Sensitivity and Resistance Rate of S. infantis by two Methods of Disk Diffusion and Micro Dilution Tube ^a, ^b.

Antimicrobial Agent	MIC, µg/mL			MIC, %	DD, %	P Value
Antimicrobial Agent	Range	MIC₅₀	MIC₉₀	R (N)	R (N)
Nalidixic acid	512-2048	614	2048	100 (50)	100 (50)	NS
Tetracycline	8-64	16	32	94 (47)	100 (50)	NS
Streptomycin	64- > 1024	512	1024	86 (43)	100 (50)	0.0012
Chloramphenicol	8-256	64	128	72 (36)	64 (32)	NS
Trimethoprim	512- > 2048	2048	> 2048	100 (50)	66 (33)	> 0.001
Ceftazidime	0.01-8	0.5	1	20 (10)	28 (14)	NS

^a Abbreviations: DD, Method of Disk Diffusion; MIC, Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations Method; MIC50, minimal concentration, inhibits 50% of analyzed strains; MIC90, minimal concentration, inhibits 90% of analyzed strains; NS, not significant.

^b Data are presented in No. (%).

Table 1. Comparison of the Degree of Sensitivity and Resistance Rate of S. infantis by two Methods of Disk Diffusion and Micro Dilution Tube a, b.

Table 1. Comparison of the Degree of Sensitivity and Resistance Rate of S. infantis by two Methods of Disk Diffusion and Micro Dilution Tube ^a, ^b.