Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2008 Jun 18;74(6):721–731. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.264

Table 2.

Studies of imaging modalities to assess fracture status in patients with CKD that report test diagnostic characteristics

Study Kidney function Imaging modality Site imaged Fracture site Area under the receiver operator curve Sensitivity Specificity
Jamal et al. (2006)66 ESRD DXA pQCT Total hip Any site 56 26 78
Radius (cortical density) Any site 89 NA NA
Radius (trabecular density) Any site 52 NA NA
Jamal et al. (2002)65 ESRD DXA Femoral neck Any site 47.3 26 78
Ultrasound Calcaneous Any site 56.2 29 78
Fontaine et al. (2000)85 ESRD DXA Femoral neck Any site 75.5 NA NA
Radius (mid) Any site 83.7 NA NA
Radius (one-third) Any site 78.0 NA NA
Lumbar Spine Any site 72.8 NA NA
Yamaguchi et al. (1996)52 ESRD DXA Lumbar spine Vertebral 72.9 70 70
Non-spine 69.3 63 63
Radius (one-third) Vertebral 75.2 69 69
Radius (ultradistal) Non-spine 86.9 82 82
Atsumi et al. (1999)21 ESRD DXA Total body Vertebral 55 NA NA
Lumbar spine Vertebral 60 NA NA

CKD, chronic kidney disease; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; NA, not applicable; pQCT, peripheral quantitative computed tomography.