Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 12;64(6):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.056

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Sick Sinus Syndrome in the General Population

Paul N Jensen *,, Noelle N Gronroos §, Lin Y Chen ||, Aaron R Folsom §, Chris deFilippi , Susan R Heckbert *,†,, Alvaro Alonso §
PMCID: PMC4139053  NIHMSID: NIHMS611554  PMID: 25104519

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome (SSS), a common indication for pacemaker implantation.

Objectives

To describe the epidemiology of SSS.

Methods

This analysis included 20,572 participants (mean baseline age 59 years, 43% male) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), who at baseline were free of prevalent atrial fibrillation and pacemaker therapy, had a heart rate of ≥50 bpm unless using beta blockers, and were identified as white or black race. Incident SSS cases were identified by hospital discharge ICD-9-CM code 427.81 and validated by medical record review.

Results

During an average 17 years of follow-up, 291 incident SSS cases were identified (unadjusted rate 0.8 per 1,000 person-years). Incidence increased with age (HR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.47–2.05 per 5-year increment), and blacks had a 41% lower risk of SSS than whites (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.98). Incident SSS was associated with greater baseline body mass index, height, NT-proBNP, and cystatin C, with longer QRS interval, with lower heart rate, and with prevalent hypertension, right bundle branch block, and cardiovascular disease. We project that the annual number of new SSS cases in the United States will increase from 78,000 in 2012 to 172,000 in 2060.

Conclusions

Blacks have a lower risk of SSS than whites, and several cardiovascular risk factors were associated with incident SSS. With the aging of the population, the number of Americans with SSS will increase dramatically over the next 50 years.

Keywords: Sick Sinus Syndrome, Tachy-brady syndrome, Pacemaker, Epidemiology

Introduction

Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) is a cardiac conduction disorder characterized by symptomatic dysfunction of the sinoatrial node. On the electrocardiogram (ECG), SSS usually manifests as sinus bradycardia, sinus arrest, or sinoatrial block, and is sometimes accompanied by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (“tachy-brady” syndrome). Typical symptoms of SSS include syncope, dizziness, palpitations, exertional dyspnea, easy fatigability from chronotropic incompetence, heart failure, and angina (13). Clinically significant SSS typically requires pacemaker implantation. Approximately 30–50% of pacemaker implantations in the United States list SSS as the primary indication (4).

Epidemiologic information about SSS is limited. While past studies have described the characteristics of individuals hospitalized for SSS, the incidence of SSS in the general population remains unclear. Additionally, no prior epidemiologic studies have evaluated potential risk factors for incident SSS. The goals of this analysis were to determine the age and sex-specific incidence of SSS in white and black participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), as well as to investigate associations of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors with incident SSS.

Methods

Study population

The prospective, cohort ARIC study comprised 15,792 individuals aged 45 to 64 years when recruited between 1987 and 1989 from 4 U.S. communities: Forsyth County, NC; Jackson, MS (blacks only); Washington County, MD; and the northwestern suburbs of Minneapolis, MN. The prospective cohort CHS study consisted of 5,888 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older from 4 U.S. communities: Forsyth County, NC; Sacramento County, CA; Washington County, MD; and Pittsburgh, PA. From 1989 to 1990, CHS recruited 5,201 participants; 687 blacks were included from 1992 to 1993. The ARIC and CHS design and recruitment are described in detail elsewhere (57).

Identification of incident SSS

Incident SSS was ascertained during cohort follow-up from hospitalization records (8,9). Medical records were reviewed for hospitalizations that included International Classification of Disease, revision 9, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 427.81 (SSS, sinoatrial node dysfunction, tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, persistent sinus bradycardia) in any position. We considered SSS to be present if the medical record included a diagnosis of SSS and symptoms or signs consistent with SSS (e.g., syncope, dizziness, bradycardia, sinus pauses), with no evidence of other conditions responsible for the episode, such as atrioventricular block or medication use.

In ARIC, 294 individuals had ICD-9-CM code 427.81 in at least 1 hospitalization. Of these, we obtained medical records in 195, from which we confirmed 130 (67%) of the 195 cases after medical record review. In CHS, ICD-9-CM code 427.81 was present in 179 individuals and medical records were available for 169, from which we confirmed 99 cases (59%) after record review.

To determine the negative predictive value of ICD-9-CM code 427.81 for SSS, we reviewed medical records for a random sample of participants with selected non-SSS ICD-9-CM codes (426.0 and 426.1, atrioventricular block; 426.6, other heart block; 427.89, other atrial arrhythmia; 37.8, insertion, placement and revision of pacemaker; V45.01, status post-pacemaker implantation; and V53.31, fitting and adjustment of cardiac pacemaker). Among 178 ARIC and CHS participants with these selected ICD-9-CM codes, the medical records documented a diagnosis of SSS in 5 of them (2.8%), suggesting excellent negative predictive value for the absence of the 427.81 code.

In the incidence rate calculations, we included validated SSS cases and a random sample of 63% of the 109 individuals with ICD-9-CM code 427.81 for whom medical records were not available. This sampling proportion was based on the positive predictive value of the ICD-9-CM code 427.81 in those with available medical records. We included only validated cases in the risk factor analysis; unvalidated cases were classified as non-cases.

Risk factor ascertainment

Similar methods were used in ARIC and CHS to assess most risk factors, as described previously (10,11). Participants underwent a baseline study examination that included height and weight measurement, blood pressure measurement by a random-zero sphygmomanometer, and 12-lead resting ECG. Race, smoking, and alcohol consumption information were determined by self-report. Information was collected on medication use, and blood was collected with the participant in a fasting state, from which glucose, HDL and LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T, cystatin C, and creatinine levels were measured (12,13). CRP, NT-proBNP, troponin T, and cystatin C were measured at baseline in CHS and 9 years after baseline in ARIC. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medications by a participant who reported a physician diagnosis of hypertension. Diabetes was determined by either a fasting glucose level of ≥126 mg/dl or use of an oral hypoglycemic agent or insulin. Heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, and right and left bundle branch block were identified on study ECGs analyzed at a central ECG laboratory. A history of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and major CV events, including coronary heart disease (CHD), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke, was ascertained at baseline study examination (7,14). Events that occurred during follow-up were identified from hospitalization records, and ARIC and CHS study staff and investigators adjudicated these events (8,9). We defined CKD as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60mL/min/1.73m2; eGFR was estimated from serum creatinine levels (15).

Statistical analyses

Analyses were limited to white and black participants. Due to their small numbers, we excluded individuals from other racial/ethnic groups. Participants who at baseline had prevalent SSS or atrial fibrillation, a history of pacemaker implantation, or a heart rate <50 while not on beta-blockers also were excluded, because these conditions often coexist with SSS.

Age-, sex-, and race-specific SSS incidence rates were calculated for each age-sex-race category as the number of SSS cases divided by the number of person-years at risk in that category. Participants began accruing time at risk upon their baseline examination and were followed to the earliest of: hospitalization with SSS, death, loss to follow-up, or December 2009 (ARIC) or June 2008 (CHS).

We estimated the number of annual incident SSS cases occurring in the U.S. population aged 45 years and older during the period 2012–2060, by applying age-specific incidence rates from the ARIC and CHS cohorts to the U.S. Census Bureau population projections through 2060 (16), and assumed that no other factors influenced SSS rates other than changes in the population age structure. We repeated these calculations using the lower and upper limit of the 95% confidence intervals of the age-specific rates.

To assess the association between potential risk factors and incident SSS, we used Cox proportional hazards models that adjusted for age, sex, race, clinic, and traditional CV risk factors at baseline (hypertension, diabetes, smoking, LDL cholesterol, body mass index [BMI], and history of a major CV event [MI, HF, stroke]). In ARIC, models that included CRP, NT-proBNP, troponin T, and cystatin C were left-truncated at 9 years after baseline, the point at which these biomarkers were assessed. As sensitivity analyses, we examined models that adjusted only for age, sex, race, and clinic, and also models that adjusted for baseline age, sex, race, and clinic, and traditional CV risk factors as time-dependent covariates. Continuous risk factors were scaled to their standard deviations to facilitate comparisons of hazard ratios of risk factors measured on different scales. High-sensitivity CRP and NT-proBNP were transformed by log base 2, because their distributions were right skewed. Cox proportional hazards models were fit separately for ARIC and CHS samples; cohort-specific hazard ratios were combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis (17).

Results

From among ARIC (n=15,792) and CHS (n=5,888) participants, those who at baseline had evidence of prevalent SSS, atrial fibrillation, or pacemaker (37 in ARIC; 385 in CHS), had a heart rate of <50 bpm without using beta blockers (339 in ARIC; 217 in CHS), or did not report white or black race (101 in ARIC; 29 in CHS) were excluded from the analyses.

Baseline characteristics of the remaining 20,572 participants are reported in Table 1. The average age of participants was 59 years, and 44% were male. Due to study design, CHS participants were older than ARIC participants upon enrollment (CHS mean age: 73 years; ARIC mean age: 54 years). As expected, CHS participants had a higher prevalence of conditions associated with advanced age, including hypertension, diabetes, CHD, and CKD. Blacks had a higher prevalence of traditional CV risk factors than whites.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Included Participants in ARIC and CHS

Baseline Characteristic ARIC
CHS
Whites (N=11226)
Blacks (N=4089)
Whites (N=4427)
Blacks (N=830)
Mean or % SD Mean or % SD Mean or % SD Mean or % SD
Age, y 54 5.7 54 5.8 73 6 73 6
Male 47% 37% 42% 36%
High school graduate 83% 59% 73% 54%
BMI (kg/m2) 27 4.9 30 6.2 26 4 29 6
Height (cm) 169 9.4 168 8.9 165 9 165 9
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 119 17 129 22 135 21 143 23
Hypertension 27% 56% 56% 75%
Impaired fasting glucose 38% 34% 14% 12%
Diabetes 9% 20% 14% 26%
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 50 17 55 18 54 16 58 15
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 138 38 138 43.2 131 35 129 36
C-reactive protein (mg/dl)* 4 7 7 7 5 8 6 9
NT-proBNP (ng/L)* 211 4503 224 3107 242 661 245 1047
Troponin T (ng/L)* 7 10 8 25 8 17 12 53
Cystatin C (mg/L)* 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.4 1.1 0.3 1.1 0.3
Heart rate (beats/min) 67 10.0 67 11 65 10 68 11
PR interval (ms) 161 26 170 29 170 29 173 30
QRS interval (ms) 98 13 97 13 93 17 93 19
Right bundle branch block 0.9% 0.9% 4.2% 5.3%
Left bundle branch block 0.5% 0.4% 1.6% 2.5%
Current Smoker 25% 30% 12% 16%
Past Smoker 35% 24% 42% 35%
Cigarette pack-years 17 22 12 20 36 29 28 26
≥1 Alcoholic drink/week 39% 23% 32% 19%
 Drinks/week 3 7 2 7 8 9 8 12
Coronary heart disease 5% 4% 19% 18%
Chronic kidney disease 5% 4% 26% 19%
Heart failure 4% 7% 3% 6%
Stroke 2% 2% 3% 6%
*

Measured 9 years after baseline in ARIC

Among those who reported ≥1 alcoholic drink per week

During a mean 17 years of follow-up, 291 incident SSS cases were identified, 246 in whites and 45 in blacks. The crude incidence rate of SSS in ARIC and CHS was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7–0.9) per 1,000 person-years. Incidence estimates were similar in ARIC and CHS (eTables 1 and 2). Sick sinus syndrome incidence increased with age (Table 2) and was similar in men and women. Using the combined ARIC and CHS population as the standard population, the age- and sex-standardized rate of SSS was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.8–1.0) per 1,000 person-years in whites and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5–0.8) per 1,000 person-years in blacks (adjusted rate ratio: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.54–1.03, comparing blacks vs whites). The age- and race-standardized rate of SSS was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7–0.9) per 1,000 person-years in women and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.7–1.1) per 1,000 person-years in men (adjusted rate ratio: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.93–1.48, comparing men vs women).

Table 2.

Table 2a – Incidence Rates of Sick Sinus Syndrome Among Women in ARIC and CHS
White Women
Black Women
Age Group SSS Cases Person-Years Incidence (per 1,000) 95% CI SSS Cases Person-Years Incidence (per 1,000) 95% CI
45–54 1 17699 0.06 0.00 – 0.31 1 8627 0.12 0.00 – 0.65
55–64 8 46164 0.17 0.07 – 0.34 2 19775 0.10 0.01 – 0.37
65–74 37 50755 0.73 0.51 – 1.01 10 17171 0.58 0.28 – 1.07
75–84 61 29887 2.04 1.56 – 2.62 16 6854 2.33 1.43 – 4.07
85+ 19 6428 2.96 1.79 – 4.63 5 1206 4.15 1.35 – 9.68
Table 2b – Incidence Rates of Sick Sinus Syndrome Among Men in ARIC and CHS
White Men
Black Men
Age Group SSS Cases Person-Years Incidence (per 1,000) 95% CI SSS Cases Person-Years Incidence (per 1,000) 95% CI
45–54 1 13272 0.08 0.00 – 0.42 0 4766 0.00 0.00 – 0.77
55–64 14 38162 0.37 0.20 – 0.62 3 10807 0.28 0.06 – 0.81
65–74 43 41075 1.05 0.76 – 1.41 6 9411 0.64 0.23 – 1.39
75–84 47 20807 2.26 1.66 – 3.00 2 3435 0.58 0.07 – 2.10
85+ 15 3926 3.82 2.14 – 6.30 0 399 0.00 0.00 – 9.25

Based on ARIC and CHS age-specific rates of SSS and U.S. Census Bureau Population Projections for the United States between 2012 and 2060, we estimated that there were approximately 78,000 (95%CI: 57,113 – 99,725) incident cases of SSS in 2012, and that this number would increase to almost 172,000 (95% CI: 127,939–216,692) per year by 2060 (Figure 1). Most of this increment would be caused by an increased number of SSS events among individuals age 75 years and older.

Figure 1. Estimated number of incident sick sinus syndrome (SSS) cases per year, overall and by age group, United States, 2012–2060.

Figure 1

The shaded area corresponds to the range of estimates based on the 95% confidence intervals of age-specific rates.

In models adjusted for age, sex, race, clinic, and CV risk factors, incident SSS was associated with greater BMI, height, NT-proBNP, and cystatin C, with longer QRS interval, with lower heart rate, and with prevalent hypertension, right bundle branch block, and history of a major CV event (Figure 2). While male sex was not associated with incident SSS (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.73–2.50), blacks appeared to have a lower risk of SSS than whites (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.98) after adjustment for age, sex, and CV risk factors. Results were similar for all risk factors in the ARIC and CHS cohorts. We found that the use of minimally adjusted models or models with time-varying adjustment for traditional CV risk factors resulted in similar associations between investigated risk factors and incident SSS (eTables 3 and 4).

Figure 2. Meta-analyzed Multivariate Adjusted Hazard Ratios of Incident Sick Sinus Syndrome According to Participant Characteristics.

Figure 2

*Results from one multivariate model that includes all of the listed variables and study clinic as covariates. Cardiovascular (CV) event denotes history of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), or stroke at baseline. §Each row represents a separate multivariable model; each model was adjusted for baseline age, sex, race, study clinic, hypertension, diabetes, BMI, current smoking, LDL-cholesterol, and history of a CV event at baseline (MI, HF, or stroke).

Discussion

In 2 large, prospective cohorts with an average follow-up of 17 years, we observed that the incidence of SSS increases with age, does not differ between men and women, but may be lower among blacks than whites. The age- and sex-standardized incidence of SSS was 0.9 per 1,000 person-years in whites and 0.7 per 1,000 person-years in blacks; after adjustment for age, sex, and CV risk factors, blacks had a 41% lower risk of SSS than whites. We identified a number of risk factors for SSS, including greater BMI, height, NT-proBNP, and cystatin C, longer QRS interval, lower heart rate, prevalent hypertension, and right bundle branch block, and a history of a CV event at baseline (Central Illustration). This is the first prospective, population-based study to report the incidence of SSS and to investigate risk factors for SSS in the U.S. population (18).

Central Illustration. Epidemiology of Sick Sinus Syndrome.

Central Illustration

Demographic variables, such as increasing age, white race, and cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, hypertension, diabetes) may affect the sinoatrial node promoting the pathological and electrical substrate of sick sinus syndrome. Variables in the ECG and blood biomarkers could be used to characterize the substrate. Eventually, alterations in the sinoatrial node will lead to signs and symptoms of sinus node dysfunction resulting in a clinical diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome.

We estimated that the overall annual incidence of SSS in individuals 45 years and older was close to 1 per 1,000. Our rates are consistent with a previous study of SSS-related hospitalizations in the Medicare population, which reported age-specific hospitalization rates ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 per 1,000 person-years (19). This study in the Medicare population, however, did not differentiate between incident SSS and repeated hospitalizations, nor did it validate SSS diagnoses.

Even though SSS can occur in the context of well-defined conditions, such as cardiac amyloidosis and other cardiomyopathies, or in the context of ischemic heart disease, most cases of SSS are due to degenerative idiopathic fibrotic infiltration of the sinus node (3). Older age and factors associated with atrial stretch and remodeling, such as hypertension or heart failure, have been associated with diffuse atrial fibrosis and electrical remodeling (2023). The increased risk of SSS associated with older age, hypertension, elevated levels of NT-proBNP, and history of CVD in the ARIC and CHS cohorts suggest that atrial fibrosis could specifically affect the sinus node and other atrial regions involved in pacemaker activity. In addition, we observed that greater height, cystatin C (a marker of kidney dysfunction), and white race (vs black) were associated with elevated risk of SSS. Similar associations have been described for atrial fibrillation (2427). Because atrial fibrillation and SSS frequently coexist – as 1 component of the so-called ‘tachy-brady syndrome’ – the fact that these 2 conditions share risk factors is not surprising.

Strengths of this study include the large number of participants in ARIC and CHS, a long duration of follow-up, validation of most hospitalizations with a 427.81 (SSS) ICD-9-CM code, and detailed and thorough assessment of risk factors. In addition, the risk factors examined in this analysis were assessed using similar methodologies in both studies, which enabled a combining of estimates across cohorts using fixed-effects models.

Limitations

First among our limitations, because SSS is a rare outcome, we were only able to identify a limited number of SSS cases, particularly among black participants. The available person-time in black men older than 75 years of age was quite limited. In addition, it is possible that differential access to health care by race and sex may have contributed to the small number of SSS cases identified in black men (28). A previous study of Medicare claims also reported that black men were less likely than white men to be hospitalized for SSS (19). Second, we were not able to review medical records for all participants with an ICD-9 code for SSS. Because we classified these participants as non-cases in the risk factor analysis, if missing records were unrelated to the validity of the ICD-9 code, this misclassification likely attenuated associations of risk factors with SSS. Third, because we relied upon inpatient hospitalization records to identify SSS cases, we may have missed asymptomatic cases, which were less severe than those that resulted in an inpatient hospitalization, or cases diagnosed in an outpatient setting. Fourth, even though the negative predictive value of our case ascertainment was excellent (>97%), some SSS cases were not identified using ICD-9 code 427.81. Therefore, our incidence rate estimates represent a conservative estimate of the true rate in the general population. Finally, our estimates of new SSS events occurring in the United States should be interpreted with caution, since they are derived from 2 cohorts that are not representative of the entire U.S. population.

No previous studies have examined potential risk factors for SSS in the general population. Given the exploratory nature of this analysis, our examination of a large number of potential risk factors resulted in multiple comparisons, which may lead to the appearance of some associations due to chance. However, the directionality and strength of associations between risk factors and incident SSS were largely similar in independent ARIC and CHS models, which decreases the likelihood that these associations are spurious. Regardless, these findings are exploratory in nature; future research is needed to confirm these associations.

Conclusions

This study reports that the incidence of SSS increases with age, and does not differ between men and women. We also show that the expected number of SSS diagnoses in the United States will more than double over the next 50 years. We identified a number of risk factors for SSS, including greater BMI, height, NT-proBNP, and cystatin C, longer QRS interval, lower heart rate, and prevalent hypertension, right bundle branch block, and a history of a CV event at baseline. Further study is needed to confirm these findings and to further explore the difference in incidence by race.

Supplementary Material

01

Perspectives.

Competency in Medical Knowledge 1

In addition to age, clinical characteristics associated with sick sinus syndrome include white race, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, right bundle-branch block, and elevated serum levels of NT-proBNP and cystatin C.

Translational Outlook 1

Further study is needed to clarify the cellular and biochemical mechanisms that causally link these risk factors to degenerative fibrotic infiltration of the sinus node and related disease of the cardiac conducting system and both elucidate and validate preventive strategies.

Acknowledgments

Funding: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) contracts (HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C). This Cardiovascular Health Study research was supported by contracts HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01 HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086, and grant HL080295 from the NHLBI, with additional contribution from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Additional support was provided by AG023629 from the National Institute on Aging (NIA). A full list of principal CHS investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.chs-nhlbi.org. This study was additionally funded by grants R21 HL109611, T32 HL07770, and T32 HL007902 from the NHLBI.

The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC and CHS studies for their important contributions.

Abbreviations

SSS

sick sinus syndrome

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Ferrer MI. The sick sinus syndrome. Circulation. 1973;47:635–41. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.47.3.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferrer MI. The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. JAMA. 1968;206:645–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adan V, Crown LA. Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:1725–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacing and defibrillation in the United States in 1993. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:187–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, et al. The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1:263–76. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tell GS, Fried LP, Hermanson B, et al. Recruitment of adults 65 years and older as participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:358–66. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(93)90062-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:687–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.White AD, Folsom AR, Chambless LE, et al. Community surveillance of coronary heart disease in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: methods and initial two years’ experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:223–33. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ives DG, Fitzpatrick AL, Bild DE, et al. Surveillance and ascertainment of cardiovascular events. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;5:278–85. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)00093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sturgeon JD, Folsom AR, Longstreth WT, Jr, et al. Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage in a pooled prospective study. Stroke. 2007;38:2718–25. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.487090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sturgeon JD, Folsom AR, Longstreth WT, Jr, et al. Hemostatic and inflammatory risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage in a pooled cohort. Stroke. 2008;39:2268–73. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patton KK, Ellinor PT, Heckbert SR, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is a major predictor of the development of atrial fibrillation: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation. 2009;120:1768–74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.873265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R, et al. Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2049–60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Psaty BM, Kuller LH, Bild D, et al. Methods of assessing prevalent cardiovascular disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;5:270–7. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)00092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Population Division U.S. Census Bureau. 2012 National Population Projections. U.S. Census Bureau; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, et al. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synthesis Methods. 2010;1:97–111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baine WB, Yu W, Weis KA. Trends and outcomes in the hospitalization of older Americans for cardiac conduction disorders or arrhythmias, 1991–1998. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:763–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, et al. Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation. 1999;100:87–95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sanders P, Morton JB, Davidson NC, et al. Electrical remodeling of the atria in congestive heart failure: electrophysiological and electroanatomic mapping in humans. Circulation. 2003;108:1461–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000090688.49283.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sanders P, Morton JB, Kistler PM, et al. Electrophysiological and electroanatomic characterization of the atria in sinus node disease: evidence of diffuse atrial remodeling. Circulation. 2004;109:1514–22. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121734.47409.AA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kistler PM, Sanders P, Fynn SP, et al. Electrophysiologic and electroanatomic changes in the human atrium associated with age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:109–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alonso A, Agarwal SK, Soliman EZ, et al. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in whites and African-Americans: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am Heart J. 2009;158:111–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jensen PN, Thacker EL, Dublin S, et al. Racial differences in the incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:276–80. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alonso A, Lopez FL, Matsushita K, et al. Chronic kidney disease is associated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2011;123:2946–53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.020982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rosenberg MA, Patton KK, Sotoodehnia N, et al. The impact of height on the risk of atrial fibrillation: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2709–17. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kaiser Family Foundation. Examining Sources of Supplemental Insurance and Prescription Drug Coverage Among Medicare Beneficiaries: Findings from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Study. 2007 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES