Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 5;2014:890626. doi: 10.1155/2014/890626

Table 3.

Characteristics of included studies.

Author,
year, and methods
Participants Interventions Outcomes Notes
Caudal versus inguinal nerve block

Abdellatif
2012 [8] 
RCT, 2 groups, parallel design
Children with unilateral groin surgery
Age: 1–6 yrs
US guided INB against blind CB; both done preoperatively under GA.
No use of adrenaline.
CHEOPS scale and also the number of children needing rescue analgesic provided. 1 patient in CB and 2 in INB were excluded due to failure.

Fisher et al., 
1993 [9] 
RCT, 3 groups, parallel design
Children having herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy
Age: 0.5–10 yrs
2 groups of CB (with or without the use of epinephrine) against INB;
both done after the procedure.
Primary outcome: postoperative voiding with analgesia outcomes as secondary.Single time point reporting of rescue analgesia. For the purpose of the review the caudal groups were combined as 1 group.
4 patients in each group were excluded because of failure of interventions.

Markham et al.,
1986 [10] 
RCT, 2-arm
parallel trial
Children having herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy
Age: 1–12 years
CB against INB; both done preoperatively, without image guidance under GA.
No use of adrenaline.
The outcome was intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

Scott et al.,
1989 [11] 
RCT, 2-arm
parallel trial
Children having herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy
Age: 3–8 years
CB against INB; both done preoperatively, without image guidance under GA.
No use of adrenaline.
Primary outcome: effectiveness of postoperative analgesia.

Hanallah et al.,
1987 [12]
RCT, 3-arm
parallel trial
Orchidopexy
Age: 18 months–12 years
CB against INB, with the 3rd group acting as a control.
All interventions done after surgery, without image guidance
No use of adrenaline.
Primary outcome: postoperative analgesia as median and range without specifying the time point. Not included in the quantitative analysis.
The authors also combined both treatment groups compared to the control group to report the use of rescue analgesia.

Caudal versus infiltration

Machotta et al.,
2003 [13]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel trial
Children having unilateral Hernia
Age: 0–5 yrs
CB against wound infiltration; both done after the surgery.
No Image guidance or use of epinephrine.
Postoperative analgesia. Hannalah scale as well as children needing rescue analgesic. Adverse events are not specifically (individually) reported.

Lafferty et al.,
1990 [14]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having orchiopexy
Age: 2–15 years
CB done preoperatively versus wound infiltration done before full surgical closure. No image guidance or use of epinephrine. Postoperative analgesia by a 10 cm linear analogue scale and use of rescue analgesia. Poor reporting of methods and outcome assessment

Fell et al.,
1988 [15]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having inguinal herniotomy
Mean age
CB: 4.5 ± 2.9 yrs
INF: 3.7 ± 2.5 yrs
Caudal done preoperatively versus wound infiltration after surgery.
No image guidance or use of epinephrine
Analgesia rated on a 3-point scale. Proportions of patients who were pain free provided. Calculation of the number of children needing rescue analgesic was done indirectly.
1 patient was excluded as the data was incomplete.

Conroy et al.,
1993 [16]
RCT, 3-arm
parallel trial,
with a
control group.
Children having a bilateral inguinal hernia
Age: 2 months–10 years
CB done preoperatively versus INF after surgery.
No image guidance.
Epinephrine used in both groups.
Postoperative analgesia. Specific time point used to calculate the number of rescues analgesic not clearly mentioned. Children in the control group were not included in this review.
Confusion in the randomization code, in the first 30 pts, led to more children having caudal blocks.

Jahromi et al.,
2012 [17]
RCT, 3-arm
parallel design
Unilateral inguinal hernia
Age: 0.3–7 years
Caudal versus INF, both done after the surgery.
No image guidance or epinephrine was used.
3rd group of acetaminophen was not included
Analgesia in FLACC scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. 3 children in the caudal group were excluded because of failed caudal.

Schindler et al.,
1991 [18]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Unilateral inguinal hernia
Age: 2 months–12 years
CB done preoperatively versus INF done before full surgical closure. No image guidance or epinephrine used. Analgesia in CHEOPS scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesia.

Caudal versus combined wound infiltration and inguinal N block

Tobias et al.,
1995 [19]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having inguinal hernia with additional laparoscopic inspection of contralateral peritoneum
Mean age
CB: 1.2 ± 0.2 yrs
Comparator: 1.3 ± 0.4 yrs
CB placed presurgically versus INB and INF.
No image guidance. Epinephrine used in both arms.
Analgesia using Hannalah scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesia. Laparoscopic inspection involved.

Splinter et al.,
1995 [20]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having inguinal hernia repair
Age: 1–13 years
CB placed presurgically versus INB and INF placed after surgery.
No image guidance. Epinephrine used in both arms.
Analgesia using mCHEOPS scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesic.

Cross and battett 
1987 [21]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having herniotomy or/and orchidopexy; unilateral or bilateral included.
Age: 1–13 years
CB versus INB and INF, all placed before surgery.
No image guidance. Epinephrine used only in the comparator group.
Analgesia using linear analogue scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. The dose of local anesthetic was different depending on unilateral and bilateral surgeries.

Somri et al.,
2002 [22]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having orchidopexy
Age: 1–8 years
CB versus combined INB and INF.
No image guidance or use of epinephrine.
Primary outcome-effect of catecholamine level. Analgesia as a secondary outcome, reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. The report is titled as a comparison of CB versus INB; however the methods mention that they supplemented the INB with INF.

Bhattarai et al.,
2005 [23]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Children having herniotomy
Age: 1–14 years
CB versus combined INB and INF; all interventions done after surgery.
No image guidance used.
Analgesia reported as mean duration and also as the number needing rescue analgesic.

Caudal versus others

Tug et al.,
2011 [24]
RCT, 2-arm
parallel design
Inguinal hernia
Age: 3–7 years
CB versus PVB; both placed presurgically. Rescue analgesia at 2 and 4 hrs and also in mean (±SD scores). 2 (PVB) and 4 (CB) were excluded due to technical failures.

(RCT: randomised control trial, CB: caudal block, INB: inguinal nerve block, and INF: infiltration).