Table 3.
Author, year, and methods |
Participants | Interventions | Outcomes | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Caudal versus inguinal nerve block | ||||
| ||||
Abdellatif 2012 [8] RCT, 2 groups, parallel design |
Children with unilateral groin surgery Age: 1–6 yrs |
US guided INB against blind CB; both done preoperatively under GA. No use of adrenaline. |
CHEOPS scale and also the number of children needing rescue analgesic provided. | 1 patient in CB and 2 in INB were excluded due to failure. |
| ||||
Fisher et al., 1993 [9] RCT, 3 groups, parallel design |
Children having herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy Age: 0.5–10 yrs |
2 groups of CB (with or without the use of epinephrine) against INB; both done after the procedure. |
Primary outcome: postoperative voiding with analgesia outcomes as secondary.Single time point reporting of rescue analgesia. | For the purpose of the review the caudal groups were combined as 1 group. 4 patients in each group were excluded because of failure of interventions. |
| ||||
Markham et al., 1986 [10] RCT, 2-arm parallel trial |
Children having herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy Age: 1–12 years |
CB against INB; both done preoperatively, without image guidance under GA. No use of adrenaline. |
The outcome was intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. | |
| ||||
Scott et al., 1989 [11] RCT, 2-arm parallel trial |
Children having herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy Age: 3–8 years |
CB against INB; both done preoperatively, without image guidance under GA. No use of adrenaline. |
Primary outcome: effectiveness of postoperative analgesia. | |
| ||||
Hanallah et al., 1987 [12] RCT, 3-arm parallel trial |
Orchidopexy Age: 18 months–12 years |
CB against INB, with the 3rd group acting as a control. All interventions done after surgery, without image guidance No use of adrenaline. |
Primary outcome: postoperative analgesia as median and range without specifying the time point. | Not included in the quantitative analysis. The authors also combined both treatment groups compared to the control group to report the use of rescue analgesia. |
| ||||
Caudal versus infiltration | ||||
| ||||
Machotta et al., 2003 [13] RCT, 2-arm parallel trial |
Children having unilateral Hernia Age: 0–5 yrs |
CB against wound infiltration; both done after the surgery. No Image guidance or use of epinephrine. |
Postoperative analgesia. Hannalah scale as well as children needing rescue analgesic. | Adverse events are not specifically (individually) reported. |
| ||||
Lafferty et al., 1990 [14] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having orchiopexy Age: 2–15 years |
CB done preoperatively versus wound infiltration done before full surgical closure. No image guidance or use of epinephrine. | Postoperative analgesia by a 10 cm linear analogue scale and use of rescue analgesia. | Poor reporting of methods and outcome assessment |
| ||||
Fell et al., 1988 [15] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having inguinal herniotomy Mean age CB: 4.5 ± 2.9 yrs INF: 3.7 ± 2.5 yrs |
Caudal done preoperatively versus wound infiltration after surgery. No image guidance or use of epinephrine |
Analgesia rated on a 3-point scale. Proportions of patients who were pain free provided. | Calculation of the number of children needing rescue analgesic was done indirectly. 1 patient was excluded as the data was incomplete. |
| ||||
Conroy et al., 1993 [16] RCT, 3-arm parallel trial, with a control group. |
Children having a bilateral inguinal hernia Age: 2 months–10 years |
CB done preoperatively versus INF after surgery. No image guidance. Epinephrine used in both groups. |
Postoperative analgesia. Specific time point used to calculate the number of rescues analgesic not clearly mentioned. | Children in the control group were not included in this review. Confusion in the randomization code, in the first 30 pts, led to more children having caudal blocks. |
| ||||
Jahromi et al., 2012 [17] RCT, 3-arm parallel design |
Unilateral inguinal hernia Age: 0.3–7 years |
Caudal versus INF, both done after the surgery. No image guidance or epinephrine was used. 3rd group of acetaminophen was not included |
Analgesia in FLACC scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. | 3 children in the caudal group were excluded because of failed caudal. |
| ||||
Schindler et al., 1991 [18] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Unilateral inguinal hernia Age: 2 months–12 years |
CB done preoperatively versus INF done before full surgical closure. No image guidance or epinephrine used. | Analgesia in CHEOPS scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesia. | |
| ||||
Caudal versus combined wound infiltration and inguinal N block | ||||
| ||||
Tobias et al., 1995 [19] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having inguinal hernia with additional laparoscopic inspection of contralateral peritoneum Mean age CB: 1.2 ± 0.2 yrs Comparator: 1.3 ± 0.4 yrs |
CB placed presurgically versus INB and INF. No image guidance. Epinephrine used in both arms. |
Analgesia using Hannalah scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesia. | Laparoscopic inspection involved. |
| ||||
Splinter et al., 1995 [20] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having inguinal hernia repair Age: 1–13 years |
CB placed presurgically versus INB and INF placed after surgery. No image guidance. Epinephrine used in both arms. |
Analgesia using mCHEOPS scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. | |
| ||||
Cross and battett 1987 [21] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having herniotomy or/and orchidopexy; unilateral or bilateral included. Age: 1–13 years |
CB versus INB and INF, all placed before surgery. No image guidance. Epinephrine used only in the comparator group. |
Analgesia using linear analogue scale and also reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. | The dose of local anesthetic was different depending on unilateral and bilateral surgeries. |
| ||||
Somri et al., 2002 [22] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having orchidopexy Age: 1–8 years |
CB versus combined INB and INF. No image guidance or use of epinephrine. |
Primary outcome-effect of catecholamine level. Analgesia as a secondary outcome, reported as the number needing rescue analgesic. | The report is titled as a comparison of CB versus INB; however the methods mention that they supplemented the INB with INF. |
| ||||
Bhattarai et al., 2005 [23] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Children having herniotomy Age: 1–14 years |
CB versus combined INB and INF; all interventions done after surgery. No image guidance used. |
Analgesia reported as mean duration and also as the number needing rescue analgesic. | |
| ||||
Caudal versus others | ||||
| ||||
Tug et al., 2011 [24] RCT, 2-arm parallel design |
Inguinal hernia Age: 3–7 years |
CB versus PVB; both placed presurgically. | Rescue analgesia at 2 and 4 hrs and also in mean (±SD scores). | 2 (PVB) and 4 (CB) were excluded due to technical failures. |
(RCT: randomised control trial, CB: caudal block, INB: inguinal nerve block, and INF: infiltration).