Table 4. RPF values in literature studies.
Authors | year | ml/g/min | method |
Ott CE et al. [31] | 1979 | 3.2±0.3 (n = 13) | inulin clearance |
Hermoye L et al.* a [30] | 2004 | 1.3±0.4 (n = 6) | deconvolution |
Winter JD et al. [22] | 2011 | 3.28±0.59 (n = 5) | ASL* c based |
2.98±0.60 (n = 6) | DCE* d based | ||
Zhang Y et al. [32] | 2012 | 3.20±0.67 (n = 9) | ASL based |
Zimmer F et al.* b [33] | 2013 | 4.16±1.24 (n = 6) | ASL based |
5.42±0.85 (n = 6) | DCE based |
Unit is ml/g/min.
*aunit converted to ml/g/min with 1 g/ml density.
*brat models were used in RPF measurements. Five of the six rats had a unilateral ischaemic AKI and total seven healthy kidneys were included in the calculation of mean RPF.
*carterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI.
*ddynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.