Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e105605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105605

Table 1. Top general linear models that explain variation in spring migration behaviour of juvenile and adult wood thrushes.

Dependent variable Factors retained in top model Estimate±standard error t P
Spring departure date Age (J) 7.93±2.91 2.73 0.009
Sex (M) −10.88±2.89 −3.76 <0.001
Breeding latitude 0.74±0.38 1.96 0.057
Spring enter U.S. Age (J) 9.02±2.66 3.39 0.001
Sex (M) −10.57±2.53 −4.17 <0.001
Breeding latitude 1.02±0.34 2.98 0.005
Breeding arrival date Age (J) 13.97±2.66 5.25 <0.001
Sex (M) −11.58±2.53 −4.57 <0.001
Breeding latitude 1.12±0.34 3.03 0.002
Spring migration duration Age (J) 7.73±2.74 2.81 0.008
Longitude entering N.A. No significant factors - - -
Spring migration distance Breeding latitude 79.78±26.81 2.98 0.002
Breeding longitude −107.49±25.81 −4.16 <0.001
Spring migration speed(distance/migration duration) Age (J) −80.70±33.99 −2.37 0.023

Letters in brackets indicate the base category for that estimate, i.e. J = juvenile, M = male. Full models for all variables included age, sex, breeding latitude and breeding longitude. We also included an interaction term for age and sex, although it was not significant in any model.