Table 3.
Low-salient event vs. control |
High-salient event vs. control |
Low vs. high-salient event |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t(df) | p | dz | t(df) | p | dz | t(df) | p | dz | |
Experiment A | |||||||||
C | -5.22 (19) | <0.001* | -1.17 | -3.35 (19) | 0.003* | -0.75 | -2.55 (19) | 0.019* | -0.57 |
windex | 3.95 (19) | <0.001* | 0.88 | 3.00 (19) | 0.007* | 0.67 | 0.90 (19) | 0.379 | 0.20 |
Experiment B | |||||||||
C | -5.81 (18) | <0.001* | -1.33 | -2.93 (18) | 0.009* | -0.67 | -2.70 (18) | 0.015* | -0.62 |
windex | 2.13 (18) | 0.048 | 0.49 | 0.87 (18) | 0.394 | 0.20 | 2.28 (18) | 0.035 | 0.52 |
Post hoc tests for Analyses of variance (Table 1) with significant effects. Analyzed were the processing speed, C (letters/s) and the laterality of attentional weighting, windex. Stated are t values with degrees of freedom (df), p values, and Cohen’s dz as effect size. Comparisons were conducted with t-tests for dependent samples which were corrected for multiple comparisons using a modified Bonferroni adjustment (Keppel, 1973). *p < 0.033 (adjusted significance criterion).