Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 21;5:930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00930

Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons between attentional components of the three conditions.

Low-salient event vs. control
High-salient event vs. control
Low vs. high-salient event
t(df) p dz t(df) p dz t(df) p dz
Experiment A
C -5.22 (19) <0.001* -1.17 -3.35 (19) 0.003* -0.75 -2.55 (19) 0.019* -0.57
windex 3.95 (19) <0.001* 0.88 3.00 (19) 0.007* 0.67 0.90 (19) 0.379 0.20
Experiment B
C -5.81 (18) <0.001* -1.33 -2.93 (18) 0.009* -0.67 -2.70 (18) 0.015* -0.62
windex 2.13 (18) 0.048 0.49 0.87 (18) 0.394 0.20 2.28 (18) 0.035 0.52

Post hoc tests for Analyses of variance (Table 1) with significant effects. Analyzed were the processing speed, C (letters/s) and the laterality of attentional weighting, windex. Stated are t values with degrees of freedom (df), p values, and Cohen’s dz as effect size. Comparisons were conducted with t-tests for dependent samples which were corrected for multiple comparisons using a modified Bonferroni adjustment (Keppel, 1973). *p < 0.033 (adjusted significance criterion).