Table 3.
Craving | Smoking | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appetitive Craving | Distress Craving | Prob. Smoking | Latency to Smoke | # of puffs | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Beta (SE) | p | Beta (SE) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | HR (95% CI) | p | Beta (SE) | p | |
Main effects (across all cues) | ||||||||||
CDF | 0.41 (0.06) | *** | 0.45 (0.06) | *** | 1.88 (1.26 - 2.82) | * | 1.29 (1.10 – 1.50) | * | 0.27 (0.07) | *** |
FTND | 0.32 (0.07) | *** | 0.37 (0.07) | *** | 1.68 (1.09 - 2.59) | ‘ | 1.24 (1.04 – 1.47) | ‘ | 0.01 (0.08) | ns |
NDSS-T | 0.36 (0.06) | *** | 0.37 (0.06) | *** | 1.82 (1.19 - 2.77) | * | 1.20 (1.03 – 1.40) | ‘ | 0.18 (0.07) | * |
HONC | 0.27 (0.06) | *** | 0.23 (0.07) | ** | 1.38 (0.97 - 1.96) | ns | 1.16 (1.00 – 1.35) | ns | 0.20 (0.07) | * |
WISDM_PDM | 0.29 (0.06) | *** | 0.30 (0.07) | *** | 1.42 (0.93 - 2.17) | ns | 1.17 (1.00 – 1.36) | ns | 0.20 (0.07) | * |
WISDM SDM | 0.33 (0.06) | *** | 0.41 (0.06) | *** | 1.94 (1.24 - 3.02) | * | 1.25 (1.09 – 1.44) | * | 0.31 (0.06) | *** |
Note. All analyses are weighted by race to account for oversampling of African American participants, and to control for session number, minutes since last cigarette (log-transformed), and average daily CPD. Smoking analyses also controlled for cue type.
denotes effects that were considered not significant at the designated p < .01 criterion level, but were p < .05 (i.e., .05 > p > .01)
ns denotes non-significant effects (p > 0.05)
p < .01,
p < .001,
p < .0001.