Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Jul 4;37(6):417–422. doi: 10.1159/000362922

Table 1.

Baseline infarct patterns and angiographic features.

BASELINE INFARCT PATTERNS Perforator Territorial (embolic a-to-a) Borderzone Mixed P*

Stenosis severity 0.65
 - 50–70% (n=74) 18 (24.3%) 35 (47.3%) 8 (10.8%) 13 (17.6%)
 - ≥70% (n=62) 16 (25.8%) 34 (54.8%) 4 (6.4%) 8 (13%)
Collaterals (ASITN/SIR) 0.56
 - None (0) (n=82) 22 (26.8%) 42 (51.2%) 5 (6.1%) 13 (15.9%)
 - Poor (1–2) (n=35) 7 (20%) 18 (51.4%) 5 (14.3%) 5 (14.3%)
 - Good (3–4) (n=19) 5 (26.3%) 9 (47.4%) 2 (10.5%) 3 (15.8%)
Stenosis location <0.01
 - ICA (n=20) 1 (5%) 13 (65%) 1 (5%) 5 (25%)
 - MCA (n=47) 9 (19.1%) 17 (36.2%) 11 (23.4%) 10 (21.3%)
 - Vertebral (n=29) 7 (24.1%) 22 (75.9%) 0 0
 - Basilar (n=29) 13 (44.8%) 12 (41.4%) 0 4 (13.8%)
 - Tandem (n=11) 4 (36.4%) 5 (45.4%) 0 2 (18.2%)

In brackets, percentage of each stroke pattern according to each angiographic category. Location of stenosis: ICA: internal carotid artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery; VA: vertebral artery; BA: basilar artery; Tandem: ICA+MCA or VA+BA concomitant stenoses.

*

Chi-Square test for comparisons among any of the subgroups