Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem J. 2011 Aug 1;437(3):399–411. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101381

Figure 3. Interaction of the EWI2 cytoplasmic domain with membrane PIPs.

Figure 3

(A) The binding of the EWI2 tail to PI4P in liposomes. The fluorescent liposomes that contain POPC, PtdIns4P and NBD PC at amolar ratio of 53:1:6were incubated with the avidin-conjugated agarose beads that were immobilized with biotinylated EWI2 cytoplasmic domain peptides in vesicle-binding buffer at room temperature for 1 h. The beads were then collected with brief centrifugation, followed by three washes with vesicle-binding buffer. The fluorescence intensity of the liposomes that were pulled-down by the beads was measured at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm using a HTS7000 Fluoremeter (PerkinElmer). The results (means ± S.E.M.) for four independent experiments were plotted as a histogram; the differences between the wild-type and KCM1 and KCM2 peptides are statistically significant (P < 0.01). (B) The intracellular co-localization of EWI2 with PtdIns4P. NIH 3T3 transfectant cells were fixed, permeabilized and incubated with anti-EWI2 mAb, anti-PIP4 mAb and secondary antibodies as described in the Materials and methods section. Confocal microscopic images in the same Z plane were captured under the identical instrument setting. Scale bar, 10 µM. The co-localization of EWI2 (red) with PtdIns4P (green) was quantified using Zeiss LSM 510 software with a threshold of 170 set for both green and red channels. The PtdIns4P -co-localized EWI2 was presented as Manders co-localization coefficient X 100% and projected as the means ± S.E. (n = 3). In each experiment, more than 70 cells were analysed from each transfectant. P < 0.05 between wild-type and KCM1 transfectant cells.