Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 17;6(2):57–67. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552008000200001

Table 2.

The pharmacists’ perspectives regarding the relevance and importance of the physician Informed Shared Decision Making (ISDM) competencies to pharmacy practice

Competency* Totals All Categories n=20 Pharmacy Categories
Community Dispensing n=5 Community Disease Management n=5 Hospital B.Sc.Pharm n=5 Hospital PharmD n=5
R/ I R/ I R/ I R/ I R/ I
1. Develop a partnership with the patient 20 (100%)/ 16 (80%) 5/ 4 5/ 5 5/ 5 5/ 2
2. Establish patient’s preferences for information 20 (100%)/ 10 (50%) 5/ 3 5/ 2 5/ 3 5/ 2
3. Establish patient’s preferences for role in decision making 12 (60%)/ 5 (25%) 3/ 1 2/ 0 4/ 3 3/ 1
4. Respond to the patient’s ideas, concerns & expectations 18 (90%)/ 10 (50%) 5/ 2 4/ 2 4/ 4 5/ 2
5. Identify choices & evaluate the evidence 14 (70%)/ 8 (40%) 1/ 1 4/ 2 4/ 4 5/ 1
6. Present evidence 15 (75%)/ 8 (40%) 4/ 1 5/ 1 2/ 4 4/ 2
7. Negotiate a decision 15 (75%)/ 8 (40%) 5/ 1 3/ 2 2/ 3 5/ 2
8. Agree on an action plan and follow-up 20 (100%)/ 9 (45%) 5/ 2 5/ 2 5/ 3 5/ 2
*

Abbreviated form of ISDM competencies for physicians. Refer to Table 1 for a detailed wording of each competency.

R = relevant, I = important, percentages shown where appropriate.