Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 5;14:218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0218-7

Table 2.

Comparison of time series data among the OD (off-duty), 2NS (two night shifts) and 4NS (four night shifts) groups

Variables (mean ± SD) Group ( n = 23, 20, 16) Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 Time 4 F(2,56) P- value
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Number of categories Off-duty 7.6 ± 1.9 8.0 ± 1.5 8.5 ± 1.3 8.8 ± 1.2 0.08 0.926
Two night shifts 7.9 ± 2.3 8.4 ± 2.2 8.2 ± 2.3 8.1 ± 2.2
Four night shifts 8.4 ± 1.4 8.3 ± 1.2 8.3 ± 1.3 8.3 ± 1.1
% of conceptual level responses Off-duty 73.7 ± 14.5 79.4 ± 8.9 81.7 ± 8.2 84.7 ± 5.9 0.81 0.449
Two night shifts 76.7 ± 15.7 79.4 ± 13.1 78.8 ± 15.0 77.6 ± 14.8
Four night shifts 81.2 ± 7.1 82.0 ± 6.7 81.6 ± 6.0 83.8 ± 3.1
Failure to maintain set Off-duty 1.2 ± 0.9 1.8 ± 1.4 1.4 ± 1.3 1.4 ± 1.4 2.47 0.094
Two night shifts 1.2 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 1.2 1.2 ± 1.1 1.3 ± 1.6
Four night shifts 1.8 ± 1.3 1.8 ± 1.3 1.7 ± 1.3 2.3 ± 1.3
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Scoring scale Off-duty 14.7 ± 1.6 15.2 ± 1.9 15.6 ± 1.9 16.5 ± 2.1 4.72 0.013a
Two night shifts 13.3 ± 2.8 14.0 ± 2.7 14.4 ± 2.8 14.4 ± 2.9
Four night shifts 12.1 ± 3.5 13.4 ± 2.9 14.0 ± 2.8 14.2 ± 2.0
Symbol Searching Test
Scoring scale Off-duty 14.4 ± 1.1 15.5 ± 2.6 15.6 ± 2.0 16.7 ± 1.8 6.28 0.003a
Two night shifts 13.3 ± 3.2 13.8 ± 2.4 14.4 ± 3.1 14.9 ± 2.8
Four night shifts 11.7 ± 4.1 12.8 ± 3.6 12.7 ± 3.5 14.1 ± 2.8
Information process index Off-duty 126.0 ± 7.7 130.3 ± 10.7 131.5 ± 9.2 137.7 ± 9.0 7.21 0.002a
Two night shifts 118.0 ± 14.6 121.6 ± 13.2 124.6 ± 14.7 126.0 ± 13.7
Four night shifts 110.9 ± 18.1 117.1 ± 17.2 116.1 ± 18.8 123.9 ± 12.6

Scheffé’s s post-hoc test: aOD group > 2NS group, OD group > 4NS group.