Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 19;107(4):965–973. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.043

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ig domain tilting angles in structural equilibrium. (A) Representative conformations of the my12-my13 dimer during MD simulations, which differs in its tilting angles between Ig domains. (B) Distribution of tilting angles between my12 and my13 from MD simulation, with an average of 71 ± 16°. (Red bar) 77 ± 7°, average tilt angle observed in multiple crystal structures (16). (C) Distribution of tilting angles between my9 and my10, with an average tilting angle of 23 ± 12° from simulations as compared to the experimental value of 26° (16). (D) Distribution of tilting angles between my10 and my11, with an average tilting angle of 35 ± 14° from simulations as compared to the experimental average of 27 ± 1° (16).