Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 8;3(2):161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.06.003

Table 3.

Comparison of models used to explain viral richness, ectoparasite and endoparasite species richness in Southeast Asian bats using independent contrasts. The initial model included the following variables: sampling effort (number of hosts sampled for a given virus: hsv); investigating effort (number of publications on parasites for a given host: pubn); host body mass (body mass); colony size (colony); breeding seasons (breeding); geographical distribution range size (range); and shape of the geographical distribution (fragmentation). Models are ranked from the least to the most supported according to corrected Akaike information criteria (AIC).

Dependent variables Model ranks AIC
Viral richness Fragmentation + colony + pubn 31.0
Fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 31.1
Range + fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 32.6
Range + fragmentation + colony + breeding + hsv + pubn 34.3
Body mass + range + fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 36.2



Ectoparasite species richness Body mass + colony + pubn 98.4
Body mass + colony + breeding + pubn 99.7
Body mass + fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 100.8
Body mass + range + fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 102.3



Endoparasite species richness Fragmentation + pubn 41.3
Body mass + fragmentation + pubn 42.7
Body mass + fragmentation + breeding + pubn 44.6
Body mass + fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 46.6
Body mass + range + fragmentation + colony + breeding + pubn 48.6