Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2014 Jan 26;68(4):1176–1187. doi: 10.1111/evo.12330

Table 1.

Levels of prezygotic isolation compared across three dichotomies (intrinsic postzygotic isolation, host plant divergence, and “small” vs. “large” X chromosome size). Our comparisons are for “young” (DNei ≤ 0.5) species contrasts after phylogenetic correction. The entries are mean values of the Coyne and Orr (1989a) index Ipre of prezygotic isolation, the number of comparisons (N), and the average values of DNei. Statistical significance is assessed with Wilcoxon tests. P values in parentheses are for DNei. Following C&O, the criterion for “sympatry” is any range overlap. The data analyzed are from Yukilevich’s web site.

Dichotomies Less (N; DNei) More (N; DNei) P across dichotomy (for DNei)
Intrinsic postzygotic isolation Ipost = 0 Ipost > 0

sympatric 0.77 (13; 0.21) 0.81 (20; 0.27) 0.80 (0.34)
allopatric 0.42 (17; 0.23) 0.43 (18; 0.23) 0.88 (0.89)
P for sympatric vs. allopatric 0.005 (0.529) < 0.001 (0.43)

Host plant differences Ihost = 0 Ihost > 0

sympatric 0.79 (11; 0.18) 0.76 (12; 0.27) 0.88 (0.12)
allopatric 0.4 (9; 0.18) 0.6 (6; 0.25) 0.14 (0.14)

X-linked loci small X large X

sympatric 0.73 (18; 0.25) 0.84 (7; 0.17) 0.98 (0.14)
allopatric 0.53 (15; 0.29) 0.23 (8; 0.12) < 0.001 (0.01)