Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;131(7):870–879. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.2313

Table 3.

Frequency of Macular Edema at 16 Weeks

Definite Central-involved
Macular Edema at 16
Weeks
Proportion
(%)
95%
Confidence
Interval of
Proportion
N = 261
Baseline OCT Thickness
A. No central-involved DME & No non-central
 involved DME*
0/17 (0%) 0-20%
B. No central-involved DME & Definite/ possible non -
 central involved DME*
10/97 (10%) 5-18%
C. Possible central-involved DME and
 Definite/possible non-central involved DME*
18/147
(12%)
7-19%
Baseline OCT Thickness and History of DME
Treatment
A. No DME** 0/17 (0%) 0-20%
B. Any DME And No History of DME Treatment 6/140 (4%) 2-9%
C. Any DME With History of DME Treatment 22/104
(21%)
14-30%
  Recent DME Treatment Only 0/4 (0%)
  Recent and Old DME Treatment 6/18 (33%)
  Old DME Treatment Only 16/82 (20%)

CI=central-involved; DME=diabetic macular edema

*

Five eyes, originally classified in the possible central-involved DME and no non-central involved DME group, were individually examined by the protocol chair due to small numbers in the subgroup and were reclassified into the no central or non-central involved DME (N = 1), no central-involved DME and definite/possible non-central involved DME (N = 1) and the possible central-involved and definite/possible non-central involved DME (N = 3) groups respectively in the analysis.

**

Eleven eyes did not have, and 6 eyes had, history of DME treatment.