Table 3.
Definite Central-involved
Macular Edema at 16 Weeks |
||
---|---|---|
Proportion (%) |
95% Confidence Interval of Proportion |
|
N = 261 | ||
Baseline OCT Thickness | ||
A. No central-involved DME & No non-central involved DME* |
0/17 (0%) | 0-20% |
B. No central-involved DME & Definite/ possible non - central involved DME* |
10/97 (10%) | 5-18% |
C. Possible central-involved DME and Definite/possible non-central involved DME* |
18/147 (12%) |
7-19% |
Baseline OCT Thickness and History of DME
Treatment |
||
A. No DME** | 0/17 (0%) | 0-20% |
B. Any DME And No History of DME Treatment | 6/140 (4%) | 2-9% |
C. Any DME With History of DME Treatment | 22/104 (21%) |
14-30% |
Recent DME Treatment Only | 0/4 (0%) | |
Recent and Old DME Treatment | 6/18 (33%) | |
Old DME Treatment Only | 16/82 (20%) |
CI=central-involved; DME=diabetic macular edema
Five eyes, originally classified in the possible central-involved DME and no non-central involved DME group, were individually examined by the protocol chair due to small numbers in the subgroup and were reclassified into the no central or non-central involved DME (N = 1), no central-involved DME and definite/possible non-central involved DME (N = 1) and the possible central-involved and definite/possible non-central involved DME (N = 3) groups respectively in the analysis.
Eleven eyes did not have, and 6 eyes had, history of DME treatment.