Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: P R Health Sci J. 2014 Jun;33(2):80–87.

Table 2.

Distribution of parental socio-demographic data by diet quality and weight status

Variable Diet needs
improvement
n (%)
Poor diet
n (%)
P value* Healthy
weight
n (%)
Overweight/
Obese
n (%)
P value*
Mother’s level of education
(n = 70)
    ≤ 12 grade 26 (83.9) 24 (61.5) 0.06 33 (76.7) 17 (63.0) 0.21
    >12 grade 5 (16.1) 15 (38.5) 10 (23.3) 10 (37.0)
Father’s level of education
(n = 66)
    ≤ 12 grade 26 (76.5) 21 (65.6) 0.33 33 (76.7) 14 (60.9) 0.16
    >12 grade 8 (23.5) 11 (34.4) 10 (23.3) 9 (39.1)
Mother’s employment status
(n = 66)§
    Employed 18 (66.7) 29 (74.4) 0.49 30 (73.2) 17 (68.0) 0.65
    Unemployed 9 (33.3) 10 (25.6) 11 (26.8) 8 (32.0)
Father’s employment status
(n = 72)**
    Employed 24 (72.7) 33 (84.6) 0.21 37 (80.4) 20 (76.9) 0.73
    Unemployed 9 (27.3) 6 (15.4) 9 (19.6) 6 (23.1)
Family Participates in the Nutrition
Assistance Program (n = 72)††
    Yes 16 (57.1) 26 (59.1) 0.87 28 (62.2) 14 (51.9) 0.39
    No 12 (42.9) 18 (40.9) 17 (37.8) 13 (48.1)
*

Pearson’s chi-squared test was used for HEI category and weight status;

Missing 44 because it was unknown;

Missing 48 because it was unknown;

§

missing 48 because it was unknown;

**

Missing 42 because it was unknown;

††

Missing 38 because it was unknown.