Table 2.
Predictors of Reading Disability, Weighted Least Squares Regression Model
Variable |
Interval |
Δ Person Measure Score in Logits* (95% CI) |
P
Value |
Visual† | |||
Glaucoma | vs. no glaucoma | −1.60 (−2.54, −0.66) | <0.001 |
VF loss MD, better eye | 5 dB worse | −0.68 (−1.03, −0.33) | <0.001 |
Binocular log CS | 0.1 log units worse | −0.48 (−0.76, −0.20) | <0.001 |
VA, binocular | 0.1 logMAR worse | −0.17 (−0.59, 0.24) | 0.41 |
Nonvisual‡ | |||
Age | 5 y older | 0.10 (−0.11, 0.30) | 0.36 |
Male | vs. female | −0.83 (−1.68, 0.03) | 0.06 |
African-American | vs. not African-American | 1.34 (0.39, 2.29) | <0.01 |
Education | 4 y less | −0.89 (−1.53, −0.26) | <0.01 |
MMSE score | 5 points lower | 1.22 (−0.19, 2.64) | 0.09 |
Depressive symptoms | vs. no depressive symptoms | −8.29 (−10.07, −6.51) | <0.001 |
Person measure scores are derived from the Rasch analytic model. Higher scores indicate greater ability. Therefore, factors associated with a negative change in score are associated with greater reading disability.
The impact of visual metrics are from separate models in which only 1 visual metric was included along with all nonvisual metrics shown.
The impact of the metric is taken from a single model including 5 dB worse MD and all nonvisual metrics shown.