Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 22;55(8):5284–5290. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14138

Table 2.

Predictors of Reading Disability, Weighted Least Squares Regression Model

Variable
Interval
Δ Person Measure Score in Logits* (95% CI)
P Value
Visual†
 Glaucoma vs. no glaucoma −1.60 (−2.54, −0.66) <0.001
 VF loss MD, better eye 5 dB worse −0.68 (−1.03, −0.33) <0.001
 Binocular log CS 0.1 log units worse −0.48 (−0.76, −0.20) <0.001
 VA, binocular 0.1 logMAR worse −0.17 (−0.59, 0.24) 0.41
Nonvisual‡
 Age 5 y older 0.10 (−0.11, 0.30) 0.36
 Male vs. female −0.83 (−1.68, 0.03) 0.06
 African-American vs. not African-American 1.34 (0.39, 2.29) <0.01
 Education 4 y less −0.89 (−1.53, −0.26) <0.01
 MMSE score 5 points lower 1.22 (−0.19, 2.64) 0.09
 Depressive symptoms vs. no depressive symptoms −8.29 (−10.07, −6.51) <0.001
*

Person measure scores are derived from the Rasch analytic model. Higher scores indicate greater ability. Therefore, factors associated with a negative change in score are associated with greater reading disability.

The impact of visual metrics are from separate models in which only 1 visual metric was included along with all nonvisual metrics shown.

The impact of the metric is taken from a single model including 5 dB worse MD and all nonvisual metrics shown.