Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 1;12(6):315–341. doi: 10.1089/adt.2014.587

Table 3.

Comparison of Quantitative Survival of Motor Neuron Protein Assays

Approach Dynamic range Throughput Equipment costs Cost/sample Usable matrices Screening use
Western blota (e.g., LI-COR Odyssey) 1.3–5,000 ng/mL Low >$50K $1–5 Whole blood, cell lysates, PBMCs, Br, L, M, SC, SK New assay validation, spot-check hit confirmation
ELISA 25–3,200 pg/mL Medium–high <$2K <$2–15 Cell lysates, PBMCs, Br, L, M, SC, SK Secondary to tertiary screen
FRET (Cisbio) 3–100 ng/mL Medium–high <$50K <$2 Cell lysates, PBMCs, Br, L, M, SC, SK Primary to tertiary screen
ECL (MSD) 3–10,000 pg/mL Medium–high >$100K $20–30 Whole blood, cell lysates, PBMCs, Br, L, M, SC, SK Secondary to tertiary screen
SPR 25–10,000 ng/mL High >$100K <$1 Cell lysates Characterizing new antibodies and SMN standards
Mass-speca 10–100,000 ng/mL Low >$100K >$100 Cell lysates? Characterization of SMN, biomarker discovery
Bead-baseda (Luminex) 25–50,000 pg/mL Medium >$100K <$1 Cell lysates, PBMCs, Br, L, M, SC, SK Secondary to tertiary screen

 The details reported in this table are for the quantitative versions of these assays, for example, LI-COR Odyssey systems.

aIn some cases, the performance criteria displayed relate to the theoretical ranges reported by researchers and vendors rather than from SMN-specific experiments.

 ECL, electrochemiluminescence; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; PBMC, peripheral blood mononucleated cell; SPR, surface plasmon resonance.