Table 2.
Problem | n | ABILHAND score (median logit) |
---|---|---|
Upper limb involvement | ||
Left | 20 | 1.2* |
Right | 22 | −0.2* |
Both | 41 | −5.1* |
No upper limb involvement | 17 | 2.6b |
GMFCS classificationa | ||
1 | 29 | 1.9 |
2 | 8 | 0.3 |
3 | 15 | 0.3 |
4 | 28 | −1.7 |
5 | 17 | −6.8 |
Unknown | 3 | |
MACS classificationa | ||
Easy and successful object handling | 13 | 3.9 |
Reduced speed and quality of handling | 33 | 1.2 |
Difficulty handling, needs adaptations | 16 | −0.9 |
Limited handling, despite adaptations | 19 | −2.9 |
Severely limited, despite adaptations | 19 | −6.8 |
Control of hand | ||
Normal | 31 | 1.8 |
Restricted | 60 | −1.2* |
No active control | 9 | −6.8* |
* Demonstrates significantly worse function compared to unaffected patients (P < 0.05)
aBoth the GMFCS and the MACS scores were strongly correlated to the ABILHAND logit score
bGroup of patients with no upper limb involvement used as a control group