Skip to main content
. 2014 May 14;8(3):215–219. doi: 10.1007/s11832-014-0593-0

Table 2.

Upper limb involvement shown with functional ability score

Problem n ABILHAND score (median logit)
Upper limb involvement
 Left 20 1.2*
 Right 22 −0.2*
 Both 41 −5.1*
 No upper limb involvement 17 2.6b
GMFCS classificationa
 1 29 1.9
 2 8 0.3
 3 15 0.3
 4 28 −1.7
 5 17 −6.8
Unknown 3
MACS classificationa
 Easy and successful object handling 13 3.9
 Reduced speed and quality of handling 33 1.2
 Difficulty handling, needs adaptations 16 −0.9
 Limited handling, despite adaptations 19 −2.9
 Severely limited, despite adaptations 19 −6.8
Control of hand
 Normal 31 1.8
 Restricted 60 −1.2*
 No active control 9 −6.8*

* Demonstrates significantly worse function compared to unaffected patients (P < 0.05)

aBoth the GMFCS and the MACS scores were strongly correlated to the ABILHAND logit score

bGroup of patients with no upper limb involvement used as a control group