Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;5:1031–1041. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.5.116

Table 3.

Results of statistical analyses (t-test, Mann–Whitney rank sum test, and Dunn’s method performed after Kruskal–Wallis one way ANOVA on ranks) of traction force values obtained on different samples.a

comparison d.f. test statistics P significantly different

glass: 1 vs 2
C36 38 t = 0.048 0.962 no
C40 T = 428 0.636 no
C44 38 t = 0.580 0.565 no
C50 T = 4040 0.862 no
glass vs wax
C36 Q = 7.203 <0.05 yes
C40 Q = 7.743 <0.05 yes
C44 Q = 6.938 <0.05 yes
C50 Q = 5.734 <0.05 yes
between wax
C36 vs C40 38 t = 1.105 0.312 no
C36 vs C44 T = 396 0.715 no
C36 vs C50 T = 319 0.015 yes
C40 vs C44 T = 362 0.198 no
C40 vs C50 T = 299 0.003 yes
C44 vs C50 T = 340 0.062 no

ad.f., degrees of freedom; P, probability value; Q, Dunn’s method statistics; t, t-test statistics; T, Mann–Whitney rank sum test statistics; yes, significantly different; no, no significant difference.